TranslationSheet（翻譯作業(yè)單Translation Sep-25-Task:Thefirstgreatworksofdigital turearealreadybeingTimeused:Thefirstgreatworksofdigital turearealreadybeingwrittenNaomiAldermanIt’sanunfortunatefeatureofworkingasbothanovelistandagamesdesignerthatIendupsittingthroughalotofpanels, discussionsandotherexercisesintrytogettogripswithstoryling,orwherestorypeopletrytounderstandthedigitalworld.最棒的數(shù)字文學(xué)作品已經(jīng)作者:娜奧米.(NaomiAlderman)以作家和游戲設(shè)計(jì)師的雙重工作是件不幸的事著性子開(kāi)各種會(huì)：圓桌會(huì)要在一些無(wú)關(guān)緊要的活動(dòng)設(shè)計(jì)師和設(shè)計(jì)師嘗試“已經(jīng)寫(xiě)出來(lái)發(fā)展劇情的藍(lán)Digital是負(fù)責(zé)游中負(fù)責(zé)編程的Boththesetypesofeventhavetheiraggravations.Whendigitalpeoplerunworkshopsorcolloquiaorjams(thereareinfinitenamesforthebasicprincipleofbringingpeopletogetherincombinationwithcoffee)aboutstoryling,theyoftenseemnottonoticethatquitealotofverycleverpeoplehavebeenthinkingveryhardaboutstoriesfor,oh,thepast3,000-4,000years.I’veheardpeoplesuggestthatmaybestorieshavea“pattern”or“structuralordering”thatholdstogethertheirparts,withoutapparentlyrealisingthatalotofpeoplehavewrittenaboutthis,fromAristotleon.但是這兩個(gè)領(lǐng)域的交流障不清的理由聚在一起喝咖戲時(shí)，他們總是忽視很多聰明人已經(jīng)開(kāi)始思索在事是通過(guò)某些“模板”或“結(jié)構(gòu)線索”將各個(gè)部分貫穿起來(lái)；殊不知，自Andlet’snotevengetontothepeoplewhosaythingslike“dataisastory”,“productsarea“yourrobo-vacuumcleanerhas更不用提那些聲稱“storytolyou”.Noitisn’t,nothey’renot,andno–unlessartificialinligencehascomeonmuchfasterthananticipated–it你家地寶給你講故事的且我們的地面清潔機(jī)器人也不能我們講故事除非除工智能發(fā)展地比術(shù)修養(yǎng)良好的人熱衷于舉借此長(zhǎng)篇累牘地討論在當(dāng)應(yīng)該推行“超文本”、“交互式”“復(fù)合型”的小說(shuō)和詩(shī)歌當(dāng)你試圖和孩子坐下來(lái)聊個(gè)性化定位的故事敘述未當(dāng)我向搞藝術(shù)的人和搞文說(shuō)這種話的人對(duì)電子游戲連基本概念都沒(méi)有?！澳悴籊TA看做有趣的人機(jī)互動(dòng)式文Butmoreaggravatingeventhanthisaretheforums,summits,breakoutsessionsandseminarson“digitalliture”runbyexceedinglywell-meaningartspeoplewhocantalkforhoursaboutwhatthefuturemightbeforstorylinginthisnew ermightproducehyperlinkedorinulti-novelsandpoems–wutapparentlynoticingthatgamesexist.Andtheydon’tjustexist!They’rethemostlucrative,fastest-growingmediumofourage.Yourexperimentaltechnologicallitureisalreadyhere;it’sthenoiseyou’retryingtogetyourchildrentoturndownwhileyoupenyourthoughtsaboutthefutureoflocation-basedWhenIbringthisupwithartslirytypes,Ioftengettheof“ohcome,come”responsecanonlyemergefromwhohasnowhatsoeverwithwhatgamesare,havebeen,andcan“Youcan’tclaimthatTheftAutohaslirytheysay.Maybeyoucan–ofpeoplehave–butno,wouldn’tciteGTAasexperimentallitureanymorethanI’dciterobo-Godzilla-fightingblockbusterPacificRimasanexampleofavant-gardefilm-making(it’sfunthough).Butaretheregamesexperimentingwithmoreinterestingstorylingthanany“digitalliture”projectI’veseen?Yes,certainly.Andifyouwanttothinkofyourselfaswellread,orwellcultured,youneedtoengagewiththem.Topickjust10examplesfromrecentyears,it’shardtoimaginehowyoucouldopineonthefutureofliturewithout acterfulandbreakingPortal,thesombreandengrossingPapers, dazzlinglysurrealexpl noftheAmericansubconscious,Kentuck Zero.Areyouinterediscussingexperiinanyorder”ligoodness’sake,ythemysterynarrativesofHerStoryandGoneHomeandthehilariousandunsettlingTheStanleyParable.Ifyouwanttotalkabouthowwriterscanengagewithpolitics,capitalism,ortheenvironmentalmovement,you’llbeshowing到的故事真的比我了己是受過(guò)良好教育的人或者自認(rèn)為對(duì)這個(gè)領(lǐng)域有一我僅用近年來(lái)十個(gè)例子表文學(xué)的未來(lái)發(fā)展意見(jiàn)（Portal風(fēng)格陰郁但令人欲罷不能的《請(qǐng)出示護(hù)照》(Papers,0號(hào)路》(KentuckyRouteZero)令人文學(xué)中“任意方向性閱讀”P(pán)arable本主義或者環(huán)保運(yùn)動(dòng)卻沒(méi)yourignoranceifyouhaven’tyedOiligarchy.Interestedinhowstorylerscanengagewiththemesofmortality?You’llwantSpider:TheSecretofBryceManor,orJasonRohrer’sshort,powerfulgamePassage,orthesublimeJourney.Eachofthesegamescould–andprobablyshould–betaughtinschoolstoinspirethenextgenerationofTheproblemisthatpeoplewholikescienceandtechnology,andpeoplewholikestorylingandtheartshavetypicallybeencedindifferentbuildingssinceabouttheageof16.Wehaven’tbeentaughthowtoadmireeachothers’work,torecogniseexcellence,oreventoknowthatthereisexcellencein“theotherculture”.There’sakindofsullenarroganceonbothsides,withsomepeopleinbothcampssimplydenyingthattheotherknowsanythingworthlisteningto.Thereisakindof“worthy”artsprofessionalwhothinksthatknowingnothingaboutgames–likesaying“Idon’tevenownaevision!”–isamarkerofinlectualsuperiority.Butwecan’taffordthatkindofthinkinganymore.Beingculturallyeducatedabout對(duì)設(shè)計(jì)師如何理解死亡這一有喜歡《蜘蛛：莊園的（Spider:TheSecretof風(fēng)格華美精致的《旅途》（Journey應(yīng)該在學(xué)校中用作來(lái)和喜歡創(chuàng)作故事的人及藝16歲左右就被分成不知道如何欣賞彼此的成點(diǎn)甚至不知道在“另一種文化”中也有很棒的點(diǎn)子。雙方對(duì)彼此隱隱傲慢的態(tài)度，在這種態(tài)度的影響定了對(duì)方也有值得參考的子游戲一無(wú)所知是“有價(jià)值