




版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
Outlines123
KnowledgebyHalfTheOne-SidedKnowledgeProjectReachingforKnowledgeFudanUniversityWhatisTacitKnowledgeFudanUniversity?
exchanged?
sharing“know-how”?
madeupofthingsthatweknow,butcannotexplain?
transferredthroughhuman-to-humancontactKnowledgebyHalfmaster/apprenticerelationshipsthousandsofyearsagoWithoutthetacitknowledgeexchangedthroughapprenticeship,apprenticeswouldneverlearnenoughtobecomemastersthemselvesFudanUniversityknowledgeexchangeNEW?SoTrueKnowledgeManagementiscombinedbyablendoflearningFudanUniversityboththecarefullywroughtexplicittextsthelearnedtacitexperienceofthemostseniorguildmembersTheOne-SidedKnowledgeProjectWhysomanyKMprojectsfailfailtolookatthebusinesspurposeforimplementingaKMstrategyignoretheculturalimplicationsthataccompanythecreationofaknowledgesharingculturemoresubtleproblemsincludingfadingcorporateinterest,organizationalstructuresthathampersupport,andmoreThereiscertainlynosinglereasonOneoftheoverlookedareasistheemphasisofexplicitknowledgewhileignoringthevastvalueofthetacitknowledgeFudanUniversityTheOne-SidedKnowledgeProjectFudanUniversityTacitknowledgeexplicitknowledgeEffectiveKM“seetacitandexplicitknowledgeworkinginbothdirections,incontinualfluxandmovement”leadingto“knowledgeconversion.”TheOne-SidedKnowledgeProjectFudanUniversityargumentmanagingtacitknowledgemaybethemorevitalactivity?StephenDenning‘spoint:?mostofourrealknowledgeistacit?thecommunicationbetweenindividualsisafundamentalKMprinciple?“intheend[it]providesavehicleforconveyingunseentacitknowledge.”ReachingforKnowledgecheckedareferenceofsomekind——explicitknowledgeasksomeoneforhelp——tacitknowledgeneedhelp?Thesimpletruthiswereachforhelpbothways:divingthroughmanualsandwebsites,newspapersandbooks,anddivingthroughtheexperienceandknowledgeofthosearoundus.FudanUniversityReachingforKnowledgeExplicitknowledgeiseasiertosee;tacitknowledgeisn’tvisibleandishardtogetahandleon.Withtacitknowledge,it’shardtoknowwhenpeoplearegoingtoreachforit.Again,it’smuchsimplerwithexplicitknowledge.Withtacitknowledge,themappingisn’tso“clean”.FudanUniversityTacitknowledgeexplicitknowledgetoooftencompaniesignore*Wewillseebarrierstoeffectiveriskmanagementinknowledgemanagementintext(2)ReachingforKnowledgeWikstronandNormannWithallthevalueinherentintacitknowledge,itmakessensetoplanasystematicandsimultaneousapproachtomanagingboth.Knowledgeworkersneedboth.FudanUniversityinKnowledgeandValue,refertosuchknowledgeas“know-how”andarguethatitis,“l(fā)earntbywatchingotherpeopledo.”text(2):BarrierstoEffectiveRiskManangementinKnowledgeManagementCultureandtrustExpertversusnon-expertperceptionsofriskThelanguageofriskThemanagementofinformationRiskisintheeyeofitsbeholders:theproblemsoftacitknowledgeEffectiveRiskManangementFudanUniversityCultureandtrustindividualorganizationriskEssentially,individualsperceivegreaterriskfromahazardthantheorganizationsinvolvedhavecommunicated.Fromaneconomicperspective,ithasbeensuggestedthatmanagementhavelimitedincentivestodevelopanddisseminateinformationaboutrisk.Movingtoamoreorganizationalperspective,itmayalsobethatmanagershavelittlemotivationforofferingemployeesmoreriskinformation,sincepromotioncriteriaaregenerallynotlinkedtoissuesrelatingtohealthandsafetyperformance.FudanUniversityExpertversusnon-expertperceptionsofriskexpertnon-expertfail
tomutuallycommunicatetheirperceptionsofriskaparticularlysignificantproblemwherethenon-expertisaregulatorwhomustofferadvicetoorganizationsinseekingtoprotectthebestinterestsofthepublicFudanUniversityThelanguageofrisk1.Expertswillfaceconsiderabledifficultiesincommunicatingwithoutrecoursetojargon.2.Conflictcontinuesandmayescalate,ratherthandevelopingintowhathasbeentermedco-operativediscourse3.Peoplecanusesimilartermsindifferentways,andindeeddifferenttermstomeanthesamethings.FudanUniversityThemanagementofinformationInformationhandlingdifficultiesBoundedrationalityCloseoffalternativeinterpretationofriskLimiteduseFudanUniversityTheproblemsoftacitknowledgeAriskis'theodds'thatahazardwillhavesomeimpact---itisavirtualentity,andonethatisdynamicandtransient.Creatingacommonperceptionisnotatalldesirable,sincethiswouldsignificantlyreducethegroup'scapacitytoeff
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 二零二五年度租房貸款擔(dān)保借款合同
- 二零二五年度區(qū)塊鏈技術(shù)應(yīng)用技術(shù)服務(wù)合同
- 二零二五年度風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資股權(quán)分配與業(yè)績(jī)考核協(xié)議
- 2025版家用電器原材料供應(yīng)與采購(gòu)合同
- 二零二五年度家庭養(yǎng)老床位設(shè)施租賃及服務(wù)合作協(xié)議
- 2025版深基坑支護(hù)靜壓樁施工專(zhuān)業(yè)承包合同
- 2025版不銹鋼水箱研發(fā)與生產(chǎn)合作協(xié)議
- 二零二五年度兼職員工保密協(xié)議限制與違約責(zé)任合同
- 2025版國(guó)際貿(mào)易支付反擔(dān)保合同
- 2025版城市綜合體購(gòu)物中心場(chǎng)攤位租賃管理協(xié)議
- 反詐知識(shí)宣傳課件
- 項(xiàng)目生產(chǎn)工程管理辦法
- 保密違法違規(guī)行為處分建議辦法
- 電力行業(yè)兩票制培訓(xùn)課件
- 特種設(shè)備安全監(jiān)察條例培訓(xùn)
- 2025年中國(guó)醫(yī)院創(chuàng)新轉(zhuǎn)化報(bào)告-中國(guó)醫(yī)學(xué)創(chuàng)新聯(lián)盟
- 萬(wàn)州區(qū)值班室管理制度
- 2025年數(shù)字貨幣在跨境貿(mào)易結(jié)算中的角色與影響研究報(bào)告
- 2025年安徽交控集團(tuán)財(cái)務(wù)有限公司招聘筆試參考題庫(kù)含答案解析
- 生產(chǎn)工單結(jié)單管理制度
- 北京市2025年第一次普通高中學(xué)業(yè)水平合格性考試政治試題(原卷版)
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論