老師點(diǎn)評(píng)內(nèi)容全（一）Butinthepass100,000years--eventhepass100years--our beentransformedbutourbodieshavenot. B. C.答案：參考翻譯：但是在過(guò)去的10萬(wàn)年，甚至是剛過(guò)去的這100， 【例句35】2009年完[B] [D]詞，所以~on錯(cuò)誤[微軟用戶2Carry[B] [D]詞，所以~on錯(cuò)誤[微軟用戶2Carryon]:[微軟用戶4Apply不及物時(shí)搭somethingto或beappliedto，指應(yīng)用[A]答案：參考翻譯：關(guān)于動(dòng)物智慧的研究讓很想知道，如果動(dòng)物也有同等機(jī)會(huì)的話，【例句44】2005年However,whentwomonkeyswerecedinseparatebutadjoiningchambers,sothateachcouldobservewhattheotherwasgettinginreturnforitsrock,theirbehaviorbecame markedB.markedlyC.remarkableD.答案：【例句14】1996年 “Withamindpreparedbythoroughschool,theAmericanboydevelopsrapidlyintotheskilledworkman.”headlineB.guidelineC.baselineD.答案：【例句7】1998年詞匯Greatereffortstorease mustbemadeifshortageistobeproductive[B]production[C]productivity[D]【例句7】2009年textThecurrentemphasisonstandardizedtestinghighlightsysisand thatfewofusinherentlyuseourinnovativeandcollaborativemodesofthought.[A]means[B]mean[C]meaning參考翻譯：最近對(duì)于測(cè)試的強(qiáng)調(diào)突出的是分析和程序，這意味著 【例句31】1999單Themovementofthemoon theunitof[A] [B] [C] [D]答案解析：offr主語(yǔ)一般只能是人，而provie主語(yǔ)既可以是人也可以是物，主語(yǔ)是物時(shí)，翻譯為“規(guī)定”，這里為了使翻譯的意思明細(xì)順暢，用了“創(chuàng)造”這個(gè)翻法，也體現(xiàn)了翻譯時(shí)的一個(gè)重要原則，符合不同語(yǔ)言的和表達(dá)習(xí)慣，進(jìn)行翻譯是的用詞轉(zhuǎn)化。rant指賜予，賦予，有高尚的感覺(jué)；sly指補(bǔ)給【例句8】1997年語(yǔ)法ItriedveryhardtopersuadehimtojoinourgroupbutImetwitha.[A] [B][C] [D]答案：參考翻譯：很努力地試著去說(shuō)服他加 組，但是他【例句1】1999年語(yǔ)Lifeinsuranceisfinancialprotectionfordependentslossthebread-winner’sdeath.atthecostonthevergeasaresultforthesake答案：參考翻譯：壽險(xiǎn)是為對(duì)抗家庭經(jīng)濟(jì)支柱后的損失而對(duì)于被贍養(yǎng)者的一種經(jīng)濟(jì)答案解析：atthecostof指“以…為代價(jià)”;onthevergeof指“處于…asaresultof指”由于“；forthesakeof指”為了…的利益“【例句20】1997年詞匯26Inthisfactorythemachinesarenotregulated butarejointlycontrolledbyacentralcomputersystem.[A] [B] [C][D]譯文：這家工廠里的機(jī)器是由一臺(tái)電腦共同控制的，而非每一臺(tái)單獨(dú)。答案解析：tly獨(dú)立地；individually個(gè)別地；irrespectively非逐個(gè)地；irregularlybutjointly（共同地）可知前面需填的副詞與它意思相反，因此individually最合適，而C選項(xiàng)若改成respectively(分別地，各自地)就也是可以的。（二）(2003/61)Furthermore,humanshavetheabilitytomodifytheenvironmentinwhichtheylive,thussubjectingallotherlifeformstotheirownpeculiarideasandfancies.(2004/61)TheGreeksassumedthatthestructureoflanguagehadsomeconnectionhowdiverselanguagescouldbe.(2009/48)Whileitiseasytoignoreinourcontactwiththemtheeffectofouractsupontheirdisposition,itisnotsoeasyasindealingwithadults. (2007/46)Traditionally,legallearninghasbeenviewedinsuchinstitutionsasthespecialpreserveoflawyers,ratherthananecessarypartoftheinlectualequipmentofaneducated (2001/71)Therewillbeevisionchatshowshostedbyrobots,andcarswithpollutionmonitorsthatwilldisablethemwhentheyoffend.（三）2011TextThedecisionoftheNewYorkPhilharmonictohireAlanGilbertasitsnextmusicdirectorhasbeenthetalkoftheclassical-musicworldeversethesuddenannouncementofhisappointmentin2009.Forthemostpart,theresponsehasbeenfavorable,tosaytheleast.“Hooray!Atlast!”wroteAnthonyTommasini,asober-sidedclassical-musiccritic.Oneofthereasonswhytheappointmentcameassuchasurprise,however,isthatGilbertiscomparativelylittleknown.EvenTommasini,whohadadvocatedGilbert’sappointmentintheTimes,callshim“anunpretentiousmusicianwithnoairoftheformidableconductorabouthim.”AsadescriptionofthenextmusicdirectorofanorchestrathathashithertobeenledbymusicianslikeGustavMahlerandPierreBoulez,thatseemslikelytohavestruckatleastsomeTimesreadersasfaintpraise.Formypart,IhavenoideawhetherGilbertisagreatconductororevenagoodone.Tobesure,heperformsanimpressivevarietyofinterestingcompositions,butitisnotnecessaryformetovisitAveryFisherHall,oranywhereelse,tohearinterestingorchestralmusic.AllIhavetostogotomyCDshelf,orbootupmycompunddownloadstillmorerecordedmusicfromiTunes.Devotedconcertgoerswhoreplythatrecordingsarenosubstituteforliveperformancearemissingthepoint.Forthetime,attention,andmoneyoftheart-lovingpublic,classicalinstrumentalistsmustcompetenotonlywithoperahouses,dancetroupes,theatercompanies,andmuseums,butalsowiththerecordedperformancesofthegreatclassicalmusiciansofthe20thcentury.Thererecordingsarecheap,availableeverywhere,andveryoftenmuchhigherinicqualitythantoday’sliveperformances;moreover,theycanbe“consumed”atatimeandceofthelistener’schoosing.Thewidespreadavailabilityofsuchrecordingshasthusbroughtaboutacrisisintheinstitutionofthetraditionalclassicalconcert.Onepossibleresponseisforclassicalperformerstoprogramattractivenewmusicthatisnotyetavailableonrecord.Gilbert’sowninterestinnewmusichasbeenwidelynoted:AlexRoss,aclassical-musiccritic,hasdescribedhimasamanwhoiscapableofturningthePhilharmonicinto“amarkedlydifferent,morevibrantorganization.”Butwhatwillbethenatureofthatdifference?Merelyexpandingtheorchestra’srepertoirewillnotbeenough.IfGilbertandthePhilharmonicaretosucceed,theymustfirstchangetherelationshipbetweenAmerica’soldestorchestraandthenewaudienceithopstoattract.WelearnfromPara.1thatGilbert’sappointmenturredraisedsuspicion.[C]receivedacclaim.[D]arousedcuriosity.TommasiniregardsGilbertasan whoisTheauthorbelievesthatthedevotedconcertgoers[A]ignoretheexpensesofliveperformances.rejectmostkindsofrecordedperformances.[C]exaggeratethevarietyofliveperformances.[D]overestimatethevalueofliveperformances.Accordingtothetext,whichofthefollowingistrueofrecordings?[A]Theyareofteninferiortoliveconcertsinquality.TheyareeasilyaccessibletothegeneralTheyhelpimprovethequalityofmusic.[D]Theyhaveonlycoveredmasterpieces