產(chǎn)業(yè)政策能否恢復(fù)美國(guó)制造業(yè)的領(lǐng)先地位 Will industrial policy restore American manufacturing leadership_第1頁
產(chǎn)業(yè)政策能否恢復(fù)美國(guó)制造業(yè)的領(lǐng)先地位 Will industrial policy restore American manufacturing leadership_第2頁
產(chǎn)業(yè)政策能否恢復(fù)美國(guó)制造業(yè)的領(lǐng)先地位 Will industrial policy restore American manufacturing leadership_第3頁
產(chǎn)業(yè)政策能否恢復(fù)美國(guó)制造業(yè)的領(lǐng)先地位 Will industrial policy restore American manufacturing leadership_第4頁
產(chǎn)業(yè)政策能否恢復(fù)美國(guó)制造業(yè)的領(lǐng)先地位 Will industrial policy restore American manufacturing leadership_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩37頁未讀 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

hinrichfoundation

JULY2025

advancingsustainableglobaltrade

WillindustrialpolicyrestoreAmericanmanufacturingleadership?

BYSTEWARTPATERSON

SENIORRESEARCHFELLOW,HINRICHFOUNDATION

2

Contents

INTRODUCTION

3

USECONOMICREBALANCING:HOWBIGISTHETASK?

7

OBSTACLESTOSUCCESS

12

THEEVIDENCESOFAR

15

CONCLUSION

17

RESEARCHERBIO:STEWARTPATERSON

18

ENDNOTES

19

HINRICHFOUNDATIONREPORT–WILLINDUSTRIALPOLICYRESTOREAMERICANMANUFACTURINGLEADERSHIP?

Copyright?2025HinrichFoundationLimited.AllRightsReserved.

3

Introduction

TherehavebeentwokeydriversbehindtheintensifiedeffortoftheUStore-industrializeitseconomy:economicsandgeopolitics.

TheriseofChinatopre-eminenceinworldmanufacturinghasbecomean

existentialchallengefortheUnitedStates.TariffsinthefirstTrumpadministrationandtheincreasinguseofindustrialpolicysincethenmarkaratchetingupofUSeffortstore-industrializeitseconomy.

Therehavebeentwokeydriversbehindthisintensifiedeffort:economicsand

geopolitics.Ontheeconomicfront,thefallinproductivitygrowthcoincidedwiththedeclineofUSmanufacturingasashareofgrossdomesticproduct(GDP).In

the10yearsto2005,USnon-farmproductivitygrewat3%peryearbutby2020,10-yearrollingproductivitygrowthwasdowntojust1%.Whiletheearlierphaseofglobalization,whichwasalsoassociatedwithadeclineinmanufacturingrelativetoGDP,wasassociatedwithrisingproductivityintheUS,theoppositehasbeentrueinmorerecentyears.

This,whencombinedwithperennialtradedeficitsandthewideningofthedeficitinmanufacturedgoods,hasledsometoconcludethattherehasbeenexcessivede-industrializationintheUS.

Geopolitically,China’sdominanceofmanufacturinghaslefttheUnitedStatesoverlydependentonChinaforcriticalgoods,asituationthatpotentially

1957

1959

1961

1963

1965

1967

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2009

2011

2013

2015

2017

2019

2022

2024

Figure1–Ten-yearrollingUSnon-farmproductivitygrowth(%)

3.5%

3.0%

2.5%

2.0%

1.5%

1.0%

0.5%

0.0%

Source:BBLS,FRED,andauthor’scalculations

HINRICHFOUNDATIONREPORT–WILLINDUSTRIALPOLICYRESTOREAMERICANMANUFACTURINGLEADERSHIP?

Copyright?2025HinrichFoundationLimited.AllRightsReserved.

4

INTRODUCTION

Geopolitically,China’sdominanceofmanufacturinghaslefttheUnitedStatesoverlydependentonChinaforcriticalgoods,asituationthat

potentiallyconstrainsUSfreedomofactionbothdirectlytowardsChinaandmoregenerallyinprotectingitsinterests.

constrainsUSfreedomofactionbothdirectlytowardsChinaandmoregenerallyinprotectingitsinterests.Thisimportdependencyisnotjustlimitedtothemilitary-industrialcomplexbutextendstoproductscriticaltothefunctioningofeverydaylifesuchassmartphonesandpersonalcomputers.

Furthermore,China’sindustrialpolicy-ledeconomicgrowthhasnarrowed

America’stechnologicalleadpotentiallyproducingaself-reinforcingdynamic.

ThereislittleevidencethatChinaisonthecuspoflosingmarketshareinthemanufacturingspacegivenitsdominanceofnewleading-edgeindustries.

Inaddition,China’smanufacturingpre-eminencehasmadeitthelargesttradingpartnerformostcountriesintheworld.Chinahasbecomesocriticaltoglobalsupplychainsthatitsleverageovertheworldhasreachedalevelwhereitcanexertconsiderableinfluencetoachieveitsstrategicgoals.

ThissensethatAmerica’slossofrelativepowerislinkedtoitsde-industrializationhasgivenrisetoadebateabouttherelativemeritsofre-shoring,near-shoring,andfriend-shoringasopposedtothelaissez-faireapproachoftherecentpast

ofsimplybuyingthebestvalueproposition,irrespectiveofthelonger-termgeoeconomicconsequencesorthemannerinwhichthatvalueofferingcameabout.

Awarenessoftheproblemthisde-industrializationpotentiallyposespre-date

bothTrumpandBiden.Forexample,in2012,theObamaadministrationestablishedtheNationalNetworkforManufacturinginnovation(NNMI),sincerenamed

ManufacturingUSA,withaviewtodevelopingpublic-privatepartnershipsto

Figure2一USvs.China:shareofglobalmanufacturingvalueadded(%)

35%

30%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

US

China

Source:WorldBank

HINRICHFOUNDATIONREPORT–WILLINDUSTRIALPOLICYRESTOREAMERICANMANUFACTURINGLEADERSHIP?

Copyright?2025HinrichFoundationLimited.AllRightsReserved.

INTRODUCTION

5

TheUShasbeguntoimplement

significantindustrialpolicymarking

adramaticchangeindirectionfromthepathadoptedduringtheheightofglobalization.

tacklethechallengesfacingUSmanufacturingandensureUSleadershipinmanufacturingtechnology.

Morerecently,theUShasbeguntoimplementsignificantindustrialpolicymarkingadramaticchangeindirectionfromthepathadoptedduringtheheightof

globalization.TheInfrastructureInvestmentandJobsActof2021;theCHIPSandScienceActof2022,andtheInflationReductionActof2022wereallkeypiecesofindustrialpolicyadvancedbytheBidenadministration.

TheCHIPSActprovidedforaboutUS$50billionofsubsidiesandresearchandtrainingfundingforthesemiconductorindustrytogetherwithaboutUS$170

billionofinvestmentinthepublicsectorresearchanddevelopmentecosystem.Importantlyitalsoprovidedfortaxcreditsforinvestmentinsemiconductorandsemiconductorequipmentmanufacturing.

TheInfrastructureInvestmentandJobsActisfocusedonimprovingphysicalinfrastructure,particularlytransportation,theelectricgrid,andbroadband.

TheheadlineUS$1.2trillionamountstoperhapsaUS$500billionincreaseininfrastructureoverandabovewhatwasalreadyplanned.

ThespendingcomponentoftheInflationReductionActisheavilyfocusedonindustrialdevelopmentincleanenergyindustriessuchasrenewablepower

generationandelectricvehicles.ItalsocontainedprovisionsaimedatensuringsupplychainswereorientatedtowardfriendlycountriesandawayfromChina.

TakentogetherthethreeactscanbethoughtofasrepresentingaseriousefforttokickstartarenaissanceinUSmanufacturing.

TheriseofChinatopre-eminenceinworldmanufacturinghasbecomeanexistentialchallengefortheUS.AratchetingupofUSeffortstore-industrializeitseconomyhasbeenunderwaysinceTrump1.0.

HINRICHFOUNDATIONREPORT–WILLINDUSTRIALPOLICYRESTOREAMERICANMANUFACTURINGLEADERSHIP?

Copyright?2025HinrichFoundationLimited.AllRightsReserved.

6

ThesecondTrumpadministrationis

puttingmoreemphasisonsupplysidereformtoimprovetheefficiencyof

USmanufacturingandtolowerthebarrierstoinvestment.

ThesecondTrumpadministrationisputtingmoreemphasisonsupplysidereformtoimprovetheefficiencyofUSmanufacturingandtolowerthebarriersto

investment.Forexample,TheSmallBusinessAdministration(SBA)haslauncheda“MadeinAmerica”manufacturinginitiativesaimedateasingaccesstofinanceandeliminatingredtapeandbureaucraticprocedures.

Inaddition,thePermittingTechnologyActionPlanaimstomaximizetheuseof

technologytospeedupandcheapentheapprovalprocessforinfrastructure

investment,whichhasbeenakeybarriertogrowingAmerica’smanufacturingandinfrastructurecapabilities.Theoverhauloffederalworkforcetrainingisdesignedtofocusresourcesonskills-basedtrainingtomeetanticipateddemandintradesandmanufacturing.

Thenofcoursetherearethetariffs.Inthecontextofindustrialrenewal,theirroleispurportedtoleveltheglobalplayingfieldandsupportdomesticindustry.ThiswillofcoursecomeatacosttotheUSeconomyintermsofdeadweightlossbutwilllikelyhaveagreaterdistributiveimpactoneconomicwelfarefromconsumerstoproducers.Indoingsotheycouldhelprebalancetheeconomyawayfrom

consumptionandtowardinvestmentwhichisobviouslyrequiredifthecurrentaccountdeficitistobeeliminated.

Thequestionthereforearises:willtheUSapproachtotradeandindustrialpolicyhelpitachieveitsgoalofre-invigoratingUSmanufacturing,breakingitstrade

dependencies,andalleviatingChina’sgriponglobalsupplychains?Orwillan

increaseingovernmentintervention,bothonthetradefrontandindomestic

resourceallocationthroughindustrialpolicy,significantlyreduceprosperityandindoingsofurtherreduceUSinfluenceintheworld?

Inthispaper,weanalyzethesizeofthetaskathand.Justhowsignificantisthereallocationofresourcesrequiredtoreduceimportdependencyandwhatarethecostsandbenefitsofdoingso?Secondly,whatevidenceistherethatthepoliciesinplacetodatearehavingthedesiredimpact?Andfinally,whatobstaclesare

therethatarenotbeingsufficientlyaddressed?

HINRICHFOUNDATIONREPORT–WILLINDUSTRIALPOLICYRESTOREAMERICANMANUFACTURINGLEADERSHIP?

Copyright?2025HinrichFoundationLimited.AllRightsReserved.

7

USeconomicrebalancing:Howbigisthetask?

Inmanyways,theUSeconomyhasbecomethemirrorimageofChina,reflectingtheinteractionofthetwoeconomiesintheglobalmarket.

WehavewrittenextensivelyontheneedfortheChineseeconomytoundergoasignificantrebaIancing:

IsChinaseriousaboutconsumption-ledgrowth?

Chinateeterseverclosertoalostdecade

However/inmanyways/theUSeconomyhasbecomethemirrorimageofChina/reflectingtheinteractionofthetwoeconomiesinthegIobaImarket.Ifoneoftheworldstwolargesteconomiesisimbalanced,itfollowsthattheotherprobablyistootogethertheyaccountforover40%oftheworldeconomy.

WhileinChinaconsumptionhasbeensuppressed,theUShasunder-invested.

WhileChinahassavedevenmorethanitsexcessivedomesticinvestmentlevel

requires,theUShasunder-saved,requiringforeigncapitaltomeetevenitssub-optimallevelofinvestment.Inconsequence,theUShasrunperennialcurrent

accountdeficitswhiIeChinahasrunsurpIuses.ChinahasaccumuIatedsignificantnetclaimsontheoutsideworldwhiletheUnitedStateshasbecomethelargestnetdebtor.

Asof2023,Chinasmanufacturingvalue-added,measuredinnominaldollarterms,wasUS$4.7triIIionwhiIstAmerica’swasUS$2.9triIIion.Chinaaccountedfor29%oftheworIdtotaIofUS$16.2triIIion/whiIsttheUnitedStatesaccountedforjust18%.1

Inmanyways/theUSeconomyhasbecomethemirrorimageofChina/reflectingtheinteractionofthetwoeconomiesintheglobalmarket.

HINRICHFOUNDATIONREPORT–WILLINDUSTRIALPOLICYRESTOREAMERICANMANUFACTURINGLEADERSHIP?

Copyright?2025HinrichFoundationLimited.AllRightsReserved.

8

USECONOMICREBALANCING:HOWBIGISTHETASK?

Thus,China’smanufacturingoutputinvaluetermsisabout62%largerthantheUnitedStatesdespitehavinganeconomywhichis36%smaller.

Theundervaluationoftherenminbi,ittradesatabout50%ofitspurchasing

powerparityvaIue/meansthatnominaIdoIIarcomparisonsprobabIysignificantIyunderstateChina’smanufacturingdominancerelativetotheUnitedStates.

AccordingtoUNTradeandDevelopment,forexample,in2023China

manufacturedaImostthreetimesasmanycarsastheUnitedStates:30miIIion

versus10.6million.2Inshipbuilding,Chinacommandsmorethan50%oftheglobalmarketanditssharelookssettogrowgivenitistakingabouttwo-thirdsofnewordersandistheleadingmanufacturerin14outof18vesselcategories.3TheUShasanegligibleshareofglobalcommercialshipbuilding.

Insteel,Chinaproducesmorecrudesteelthantherestoftheworldcombined

withaglobalmarketshareof53%or12timestheproductionintheUnitedStates.TheUnitedStatesproducesjust4%oftheworld’ssteel.4Inaluminum,thestoryissimilarwithChinatakingabout60%marketshareinsmelting.5

FurtherevidenceofChina’smanufacturingdominancecomesfromtradestatistics.In2024,Chinaaccountedfor14.9%ofworldgoodsexports–thelargestshare

butbynomeansoverwheImingIydominant.However/thistotaIsharedisguisesthemanufacturinghegemony.Excludingfoodandfossilfuels,China’ssharejumpsto18.3%ofworIdexports.Ofaround1/200productscIassifiedatthefour-digit

HarmonizedSystemIeveI/Chinahasmorethan50%exportsharein100categoriesandmorethan40%sharein198categories.6

Bywayofcomparison,theUnitedStateshada9%marketshareinglobalexportsin2024.Excludingfuelsandfood,thatsharefallstojust8%.Furthermore,the

UnitedStateshasmorethan50%marketshareinworldexportsinjustsixcategoriesandmorethan40%inonly13categories.7

WhenviewedthroughtheprismoftheUSgoodstradedeficit(whichstandsat

aboutUS$1.2triIIion)/thetasktheTrumpadministrationhassetitseIfbecomes

relativelyclear.Fourbroadsectorsaccountforabout80%oftheoveralltrade

deficit.Theseare:pharmaceuticaIs(HS30);vehicIesotherthanraiIwayortramwayroIIingstock/andpartsandaccessoriesthereof(HS87);eIectricaImachineryand

equipmentandpartsthereof(HS85);andnucIearreactors/boiIers/machineryandmechanicaIappIiances/andpartsthereof(HS84).AIthoughthesesectorsarebroad/theygenerallyincorporaterelativelyhighvalue-addedproductswithstrategic

importance/andAmerica’stradedeficitinthemisjustunderUS$1triIIion.

Threeofthefoursectors(HS87/HS84/andHS85)aIsohappentobethesectors

inwhichChinarunsitslargesttradesurplus.Pharmaceuticalworldexports,on

theotherhand/aredisproportionateIydominatedbyGermany/SwitzerIand/andIreland.Irelandisthefourthlargestexporterofpharmaceuticalsintheworldandisatextbookexampleofindustrialpolicyachievingitsgoals.

IftheTrumpadministration’sobjectiveistore-generateUSmanufacturingtobreaktheIong-runningtradedeficitandcriticaItradedependencies/itisimperativetounderstandtheresourcesthatwillberequiredtoachievethisobjective.

HINRICHFOUNDATIONREPORT–WILLINDUSTRIALPOLICYRESTOREAMERICANMANUFACTURINGLEADERSHIP?

Copyright?2025HinrichFoundationLimited.AllRightsReserved.

USECONOMICREBALANCING:HOWBIGISTHETASK?

9

USmanufacturingemployment

thereforeaccountsforabout8%of

totalemploymentwhilemanufacturingcontributesabout10%ofGDP

meaninginitscurrentsizeandform,USmanufacturinghasawellabove-averagerateoflaborproductivitythantheeconomyasawhole.

Ifidleresourcescanbemobilized,thisneednotcomeatthecostofother

economicoutputbut,ifresourcesneedtobedivertedfromothereconomicactivity,therewillbeanopportunitycost.Theefficiencyoftheadditional

manufacturingwilldetermineifthisopportunitycostisgreaterorlessthantheenhancementinmanufacturing.

Intermsofresourcesdeployed,USmanufacturingemployedabout12.7millionpeoplein2024.8Thisisverysimilartothepre-pandemiclevelsofaround12.6

million.Manufacturingvalue-addedintheUSin2024wasUS$2.9trillionmeaningvalue-addedperemployeewasUS$228,000,withaverageemployeeearningsalittleoverUS$100,000peryear.

USmanufacturingemploymentthereforeaccountsforabout8%oftotal

employmentwhilemanufacturingcontributesabout10%ofGDPmeaninginitscurrentsizeandform,USmanufacturinghasawellabove-averagerateoflabor

productivitythantheeconomyasawhole.Perworkervalue-addedeconomy-wideisUS$173,000,whileex-manufacturingitisUS$168,000.9ThisimpliesthatashiftoflabortomanufacturingshouldbeGDP-enhancingiftherelativeproductivitylevelshold.

DirectcomparisonsoflaborproductivityinmanufacturingbetweentheUnitedStatesandChinaaredifficultduetothelackofclearemploymentdatainChina.

AccordingtotheWorldBank,32%ofChinas740millionemployedworkforceisemployedin“industry”,implyinganindustrialworkforceof236million.

Manufacturingandindustryarenotsynonymousbutinotherdata,manufacturingaccountsforthevastmajorityofindustrialemployment.However,manufacturingemploymentin“urbannon-privateunits”isonlyabout36million,accordingtothelaborsurveystatistics,i.e.,alittleover20%oftotal.

Initscurrentsizeandform,USmanufacturinghasawellabove-averagerateoflaborproductivitythantheeconomyasawhole.

HINRICHFOUNDATIONREPORT–WILLINDUSTRIALPOLICYRESTOREAMERICANMANUFACTURINGLEADERSHIP?

Copyright?2025HinrichFoundationLimited.AllRightsReserved.

USECONOMICREBALANCING:HOWBIGISTHETASK?

10

Iftheobjectiveofmanufacturing

growthintheUnitedStatesistomatchaggregatemanufacturingoutputto

aggregatemanufacturingproduct

demand,thentheUnitedStateswillneedtogrowmanufacturingvalue-addedbyabout40%orUS$1.2triIIion.

Thestatisticson“industriaIenterprisesoveradesignatedsize”covercompaniesthatemployinaggregateover77millionpeopleofwhomabout60million

areemployedinmanufacturing,soabout78%ofindustrialemploymentisinmanufacturing.

Thesetwodatasets,ifextrapolatedtotheeconomyasawhole,wouldsuggestaround20%oftotalemploymentinChinaisinmanufacturing.A2022reportputthepercentageatanexact18.1%,quotingtheNationalBureauofStatistics(NBS)asasource.10

Ifwetake20%or148millionasanestimateandgiventhatChinese

manufacturingvaIue-addedin2024wasUS$4.7triIIion-thisgivesavaIue-addedperworkerofaboutUS$32/000.SinceChina’sGDPin2023wasUS$17.8triIIionandthetotalemployednumberofworkerswas740million,theeconomy-widevalue-addedperworkerwasjustUS$24/000.Theex-manufacturingvaIue-addedper

workerwouIdbeUS$22/000/makingmanufacturingproductivityabout1.45timestherestoftheeconomy.

AveragewagesinmanufacturinginChina,accordingtotheNBS,amountedtoUS$12/800peryear-about12.5%oftheUSIeveI-whiIevaIue-addedperworkerintheregionof14%oftheUSlevel.Whatthesenumberssuggestisthat,in

aggregate/thecost-benefitadvantageofChinaasamanufacturingdestinationhasreducedsignificantIyovertime/toaIeveIwheretheeconomicsarenoIongeroverlycompellingforitsinvestability.

Twoimportantpointsareworthnoting:firstIy/thereareofcoursemanyotherfactorssuchasscale,industryclusters,andinfrastructurethatarepotentiallyofgreaterimportancethanlaborproductivity.Secondly,Chinasoveralllaborproductivityinmanufacturingwillbedraggeddownbymassiveemploymentinlowervalue-addedindustriesinwhichtheUnitedStateshasnointentionofcompeting,suchastextiles.So,whiletheaggregatenumbersmaysuggestthepIayingfieIdhasIeveIedintermsofIaborcostsandproductivity/theindustry-specificdata-whichisunavaiIabIe-isimportant.

IftheobjectiveofmanufacturinggrowthintheUnitedStatesistomatch

aggregatemanufacturingoutputtoaggregatemanufacturingproductdemand,thentheUnitedStateswillneedtogrowmanufacturingvalue-addedbyabout40%orUS$1.2triIIion.SuchanobjectivedoesnotimpIyautarky/butrather

aggregatebalanceinthemanufacturedgoodstradeposition.

Atexistinglevelsofproductivity,thiswouldrequireanadditional5million

workers,whichrepresentsabout3%ofthecurrentemployedtotalworkforceof160million.Thiswouldbesimilarinabsolutetermstomanufacturingemploymentin2000priortotheChinaShock.

CurrentunemploymentintheUSisrunningat4.2%.U6unemployment,whichcapturesabroaderrangeoflabormarketslack,isrunningat7.2%or11.6millionpeopIe.BoththesemeasuresofunempIoymentarenearhistoricIows.However/itseemssafetoassumethatthereare“idleresources”(aseconomistsputit)intheUSlabormarkettomeetpartofthemanufacturingemploymentrequired,assumingnoskillsgap.

HINRICHFOUNDATIONREPORT–WILLINDUSTRIALPOLICYRESTOREAMERICANMANUFACTURINGLEADERSHIP?

Copyright?2025HinrichFoundationLimited.AllRightsReserved.

USECONOMICREBALANCING:HOWBIGISTHETASK?

11

America’simportdependenceis

perhapsthemostproblematicin

sixindustrycategories:machinery;

computerandeIectronicproducts;

eIectricaIappIiancesandcomponents;motorvehicIes;othertransportationequipment;andmedicaIsuppIiesanddevices.

TheproductivityIeveIofaUSworkerisareflectionofthecapitaIstockthatis

employedalongsidethem.ThetotalcapitalstockoftheUnitedStates,atcurrentcost/isUS$89triIIion.OnIyasmaIIproportionofthisisassociatedwithindustry/however.

Theprivatesector’snon-residentiaIcapitaIstockisaboutUS$35triIIion.Thisis

spIitroughIybetweenUS$20triIIionofstructures/US$9triIIionofequipment/andUS$5triIIionofinteIIectuaIproperty.ThebuIkofthisisassociatedwiththeservicessectorthatdominatestheUSeconomy.11

TheUSBureauofEconomicAnalysisproducesdetailedestimatesbyindustry

ofcapitalstock.Therearesixindustrycategoriesthatrepresentareaswhere

America’simportdependenceisperhapsthemostprobIematic:Machinery;

computerandeIectronicproducts;eIectricaIequipment/appIiancesand

components;motorvehicIes;othertransportationequipment;andmedicaIdevicesandsupplies.

ThesesixindustrieshaveacapitaIstockofequipmentvaIuedatUS$582biIIion;structuresatUS$669biIIion;andinteIIectuaIpropertyatUS$657biIIiongivingatotaIcapitaIstockofUS$1.9triIIion.12Theseindustriesrepresentthebulkof

thecapital-intensivemanufacturingindustriesoutsideofthemetalssector.

NewinvestmentofUS$200biIIionayearforfiveyearsontopofdepreciationisthereforerequiredtoincreasetherelevantcapitalstockby50%.Ofcourse,otherinvestmentsaroundtheseindustries,includinginfrastructure,willberequired.

Onpaper,toreturntheUSeconomytoasituationwhereitismanufacturingasimilartotalvalueofgoodstothatwhichitisconsumingrequiresa40%increaseinmanufacturingvaIue-added;areaIIocationofabout3%oftheempIoyed

workforceor5millionpeople,fromeitherexistingemploymentorintotheworkforce/andperhapsaUS$1-1.5triIIionincreaseinthecapitaIstockassociatedwithhighvaIue-addedmanufacturing.Thesearesignificantbarrierstosuccess.

HINRICHFOUNDATIONREPORT–WILLINDUSTRIALPOLICYRESTOREAMERICANMANUFACTURINGLEADERSHIP?

Copyright?2025HinrichFoundationLimited.AllRightsReserved.

12

Obstaclestosuccess

ThreeobstaclestoUSsuccessin

attractingmanufacturingarethetariffregime,skilledlaborshortage,andthecostandtimeofregulatorycompliance.

IftheUSistobesuccessfulinattractingmanufacturingandseeingtheflurry

ofproposedprojectscometofruition,andremainprofitable,therearesome

considerableobstaclestoovercome.Wewouldhighlightthree:thetariffregime;skilledlaborshortage;andthecostandtimeofregulatorycompliance.

Regulationandcompliancecosts

ThegrowthinregulationandtheassociatedcostofcompliancehavebeenasignificantheadwindforUSindustryinthepastdecade.

AccordingtotheNationalAssociationofManufacturers,thecosttomanufacturingbusinessesofcomplyingwithfederalregulationspertainingtohealthandsafety,theenvironment,tax,andhomelandsecurityhasrisentoUS$349billion.This

representsaninflation-adjusted26%risesince2012.OverUS$200billionofthis

costistocomplywithenvironmentalregulations.ThisworksoutatastaggeringUS$29,000perworkerbutbecauseofthefixednatureofmanyofthesecosts,theperworkercostisaroundUS$50,000forsmallercompaniesemployinglessthan50workers.

Forcontext,rememberthattheaveragewageinUSmanufacturingisabout

US$100,000ayearandvalued-addedperworkerisUS$228,000,somorethan12%ofthevaluebeingcreatedbyamanufacturingworkerisbeingeatenupbycompliancecosts,andtheabsolutecostofcomplianceintheUSwouldcover

ThecosttoUSmanufacturingbusinessesofcomplyingwithfederalregulationspertainingtohealthandsafety,theenvironment,tax,andhomelandsecurityhasrisentoUS$349billion.

HINRICHFOUNDATIONREPORT–WILLINDUSTRIALPOLICYRESTOREAMERICANMANUFACTURINGLEADERSHIP?

Copyright?2025HinrichFoundationLimited.AllRightsReserved.

13

OBSTACLESTOSUCCESS

USmanufacturingemploymentistoriseby5million,whichweestimatetobetherequirementforanadditionalUS$1.2trillionofmanufacturingvalue-added,theskillsgapwillonlyworsenunlessdrasticactionistaken.

thecostofemployingtwoworkersinChina.AnotherwayoflookingatitisthatcompliancecostsperworkerintheUSareaboutthesameasvalue-addedperworkerinChina!

Bywayofexample,WilsonBeaverandJamesFeinattheHeritageFoundation

pointoutthattheCleanAirActrequiresthattheEnvironmentalProtection

Agency(EPA)“establishemissionstandardsthatrequirethemaximumdegreeofreductioninemissionsofhazardousairpollutants.”TheEPAthushastheauthoritytodeterminethelevelofreductionthatisnecessaryandcanreviseprevious

emissionsstandards.Thus“CleanAirActregulationskeepexpanding,moving

thegoalpostsforemissionscompliancewhenevercompaniescomecloseto

compliance.Theseincreasingregulationsimposecompliancecostsonlower-tiersuppliersthatdriveuppricesandadverselyaffectsupply-chainefficiency.”13

Suchhighcompliancecostsareclearlyabigbarriertogrowthandneedtobeaddressed,eitherbyregulatorychangeorbycuttingthecostofcompliance.

ImportshaveshieldedtheUSconsumerfromthetruecostoftheregulatory

frameworkthathasbeenputinplaceinthelast10to15years.Iftariffs“work”inthesenseofinducingimportsubstitution,thenthoseregulatorycostswillbecomealltooapparent.

Labo

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論