2025ASEANIPA

ADR-MediationandArbitrationforIP

2025年東盟投資促進(jìn)機(jī)構(gòu)ADR-知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)調(diào)解與仲裁Speaker:WANGFang,DeputySecretary-generalofCCPITMediationCenter12CONTENTS目錄一、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)調(diào)解政策、法律法規(guī)和司法解釋1.IntellectualPropertyMediationPolicies，Laws&RegulationsandJudicialInterpretations二、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)調(diào)解與其他糾紛調(diào)解的多方面區(qū)別2.KeyDifferencesBetweenIntellectualPropertyDisputeMediationandOtherTypesofDisputeMediation三、四種調(diào)解形式的區(qū)別和適用范圍3.DifferencesandApplicableScopeoftheFourTypesofMediationinChina四、運(yùn)用調(diào)解解決國際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛的步驟4.StepsforResolvingInternationalIntellectualProperty(IP)DisputesthroughMediation五、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛調(diào)解工作進(jìn)展與成效5.ProgressesandAchievementsofintellectualpropertydisputemediationwork知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)調(diào)解政策、法律法規(guī)和司法解釋IntellectualPropertyMediationPolicies,Laws&RegulationsandJudicialInterpretations《關(guān)于加強(qiáng)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛調(diào)解工作的意見》：提出到2025年，知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛調(diào)解工作基本覆蓋知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛易發(fā)多發(fā)的重點(diǎn)區(qū)域和行業(yè)領(lǐng)域，建立組織健全、制度完善、規(guī)范高效的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛調(diào)解工作體系。形成多種調(diào)解優(yōu)勢(shì)互補(bǔ)、有機(jī)銜接、協(xié)調(diào)聯(lián)動(dòng)的大調(diào)解工作格局。OpinionsonStrengtheningMediationinDisputesoverIntellectualPropertyRightsoutlinesthegoalofcoveringkeyareasandindustrieswhereintellectualpropertydisputesarefrequentby2025,establishinganorganized,well-structured,andefficientmediationsystemforintellectualpropertydisputes.Theplanaimstoformalarge-scalemediationframeworkthatcomplementsvariousmediationadvantages,ensuressmoothcoordination,andfostersorganicconnections.國家政策NationalPolicy《知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)國建設(shè)綱要（2021-2035年）》：提出要發(fā)揮專利侵權(quán)糾紛行政裁決制度作用，加大行政裁決執(zhí)行力度等，為知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)調(diào)解等工作的開展提供了宏觀指導(dǎo)和方向指引。

TheOutlineforBuildinganIntellectualPropertyPowerhouse(2021-2035):emphasizestheroleofadministrativeadjudicationinpatentinfringementdisputesandadvocatesforenhancedenforcementofadministrativeadjudication.Itprovidesmacroguidanceanddirectionforthedevelopmentofintellectualpropertymediationandrelatedwork.《“十四五”國家知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)和運(yùn)用規(guī)劃》：提出要加強(qiáng)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛多元化解機(jī)制建設(shè)，完善行政調(diào)解等工作。The14thFive-YearNationalPlanforIntellectualPropertyProtectionandUtilization:proposesstrengtheningthedevelopmentofdiversifiedmechanismsforresolvingintellectualpropertydisputesandimprovingadministrativemediation.國家政策NationalPolicy《中華人民共和國民事訴訟法》：為知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛的司法調(diào)解等提供了基本的程序法依據(jù)?！吨腥A人民共和國專利法》《中華人民共和國專利法實(shí)施細(xì)則》《中華人民共和國商標(biāo)法》《中華人民共和國著作權(quán)法》《中華人民共和國反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理著作權(quán)民事糾紛案件適用法律若干問題的解釋》《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理專利糾紛案件適用法律問題的若干規(guī)定》《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理商標(biāo)民事糾紛案件適用法律若干問題的解釋》CivilProcedureLawofthePeople‘sRepublicofChinaprovidesthebasicprocedurallegalbasisforjudicialmediationinintellectualpropertydisputes.PatentLawofthePeople’sRepublicofChina,theRegulationsfortheImplementationofthePatentLawofthePeople‘sRepublicofChina，TrademarkLawofthePeople’sRepublicofChina，CopyrightLawofthePeople‘sRepublicofChina，Anti-UnfairCompetitionLawofthePeople’sRepublicofChinaInterpretationoftheSupremePeople'sCourtConcerningtheApplicationofLawsintheTrialofCivilDisputesoverCopyright，SeveralProvisionsoftheSupremePeople'sCourtonIssuesconcerningtheApplicationofLawintheTrialofCasesInvolvingPatentDisputes,InterpretationoftheSupremePeople'sCourtConcerningtheApplicationofLawsintheTrialofCasesofCivilDisputesArisingfromTrademarks法律法規(guī)&司法解釋LawsandRegulations&JudicialInterpretations知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)調(diào)解和其他糾紛調(diào)解間的多方面區(qū)別KeyDifferencesBetweenIntellectualPropertyDisputeMediationandOtherTypesofDisputeMediation調(diào)解對(duì)象與范圍

DifferencesinScopeandSubjectMatter知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)調(diào)解IntellectualPropertyMediation主要針對(duì)與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)有關(guān)的合同糾紛、權(quán)屬和侵權(quán)糾紛，以及與其有關(guān)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)糾紛等，涉及著作權(quán)、商標(biāo)權(quán)、專利權(quán)、集成電路布圖設(shè)計(jì)專有權(quán)、植物新品種權(quán)、地理標(biāo)志權(quán)、網(wǎng)絡(luò)域名權(quán)以及商業(yè)秘密等領(lǐng)域。Itprimarilyfocusesoncontractdisputes,ownershipdisputes,andinfringementdisputesrelatedtointellectualproperty,aswellascompetitiondisputesassociatedwiththem.Thescopeincludescopyright,trademarkrights,patentrights,integratedcircuitlayoutdesignrights,plantvarietyrights,geographicalindicationrights,domainnamerights,andtradesecrets.其他糾紛調(diào)解OtherDisputeMediation涵蓋范圍更為廣泛，包括但不限于婚姻家庭糾紛、鄰里糾紛、勞動(dòng)糾紛、合同糾紛（非知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)類）、消費(fèi)糾紛等。Thescopeisbroaderandincludes,butisnotlimitedto,maritalandfamilydisputes,neighborhooddisputes,labordisputes,contractdisputes(non-IPrelated),andconsumerdisputes.專業(yè)性要求

ProfessionalRequirements知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)調(diào)解IntellectualPropertyMediation知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)本身具有很強(qiáng)的專業(yè)性和技術(shù)性，如專利糾紛可能涉及復(fù)雜的技術(shù)問題，需要調(diào)解員具備深厚的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律知識(shí)，還需了解相關(guān)技術(shù)領(lǐng)域的專業(yè)知識(shí)，常需專業(yè)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)律師、專利代理人等擔(dān)任調(diào)解員。Intellectualpropertyitselfishighlyspecializedandtechnical.Forexample,patentdisputesmayinvolvecomplextechnicalissues,requiringmediatorstohaveasolidunderstandingofintellectualpropertylawandknowledgeintherelevanttechnicalfield.Therefore,itoftenrequiresprofessionalintellectualpropertylawyers,patentagents,orotherspecialiststoserveasmediators.其他糾紛調(diào)解OtherDisputeMediation雖然也需要調(diào)解員具備一定的法律知識(shí)和調(diào)解技巧，但對(duì)專業(yè)技術(shù)知識(shí)的要求相對(duì)較低。Whilemediatorsinotherdisputesalsoneedacertainleveloflegalknowledgeandmediationskills,thedemandforspecializedtechnicalknowledgeisrelativelylower.涉密性程度

ConfidentialityRequirements知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)調(diào)解IntellectualPropertyMediation知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛中的專利技術(shù)、商業(yè)秘密等往往涉及當(dāng)事人不愿公開的技術(shù)細(xì)節(jié)、經(jīng)營策略等核心信息，保密性要求極高，調(diào)解過程中需采取嚴(yán)格的保密措施，防止信息泄露。Intellectualpropertydisputes,suchaspatenttechnologyandtradesecrets,ofteninvolvecoreinformationthatpartiesdonotwishtodisclose,includingtechnicaldetailsandbusinessstrategies.Theconfidentialityrequirementsareextremelyhigh,andstrictconfidentialitymeasuresmustbeimplementedduringthemediationprocesstopreventinformationleakage.其他糾紛調(diào)解OtherDisputeMediation雖然部分糾紛也可能涉及當(dāng)事人的隱私或商業(yè)秘密，但從整體上看，涉密性不像知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)調(diào)解那樣普遍和突出。Whilesomedisputesmayalsoinvolvetheparties'privacyortradesecrets,overall,thelevelofconfidentialityisnotaswidespreadorprominentasinintellectualpropertymediation.利益平衡的難度

DifficultyofBalancingInterests知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)調(diào)解IntellectualPropertyMediation需要在保護(hù)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利人的合法權(quán)益與促進(jìn)知識(shí)傳播、技術(shù)創(chuàng)新和社會(huì)公共利益之間尋求平衡。如在著作權(quán)調(diào)解中，既要考慮作者的權(quán)益，也要考慮作品合理使用對(duì)社會(huì)文化傳播的意義。Itrequiresbalancingtheprotectionofthelegitimaterightsofintellectualpropertyholderswiththepromotionofknowledgedissemination,technologicalinnovation,andpublicinterests.Forexample,incopyrightmediation,itisnecessarytoconsidertherightsoftheauthorwhilealsotakingintoaccountthesignificanceoffairusefortheculturalexchangeinsociety.其他糾紛調(diào)解OtherDisputeMediation通常主要是在糾紛雙方當(dāng)事人之間進(jìn)行利益平衡，相對(duì)而言，較少涉及到廣泛的社會(huì)公共利益等多方面的平衡問題。Typically,thefocusisonbalancingtheinterestsbetweenthedisputingparties.Comparedtointellectualpropertymediation,thereisgenerallylessinvolvementwithbroadersocietalpublicinterestsormultipleaspectsofbalance.調(diào)解結(jié)果的影響

ScopeoftheImpactofMediationOutcomes知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)調(diào)解IntellectualPropertyMediation調(diào)解結(jié)果不僅對(duì)當(dāng)事人雙方有影響，還可能對(duì)整個(gè)行業(yè)的技術(shù)發(fā)展、市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)格局等產(chǎn)生一定的影響。如一個(gè)重要專利侵權(quán)糾紛的調(diào)解結(jié)果，可能會(huì)影響該技術(shù)領(lǐng)域的發(fā)展方向和市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)態(tài)勢(shì)。TheoutcomeofIPmediationnotonlyaffectsthedisputingpartiesbutcanalsohaveasignificantimpactonthebroaderindustry,includingtechnologicaldevelopment,marketcompetition,andinnovationdynamics.Forexample,theresolutionofanimportantpatentinfringementdisputemayinfluencethedirectionoftechnologicaladvancementsandalterthecompetitivelandscapewithinthatfield.其他糾紛調(diào)解OtherDisputeMediation一般主要對(duì)糾紛當(dāng)事人雙方產(chǎn)生直接影響，對(duì)行業(yè)和社會(huì)整體的影響相對(duì)較為局限。Generally,theimpactismorelimited,primarilyaffectingthedisputingpartiesdirectly.Theoverallinfluenceontheindustryorsocietyismoreconstrainedcomparedtointellectualpropertymediation.國際性因素

InternationalFactors知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)調(diào)解IntellectualPropertyMediation在經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化背景下，知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛的國際性和跨國性越來越明顯，跨國知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛調(diào)解需要考慮不同國家的法律制度、文化差異、商業(yè)規(guī)則等因素，還可能涉及國際公約、國際仲裁規(guī)則等。Inthecontextofeconomicglobalization,theinternationalandcross-bordernatureofintellectualpropertydisputeshasbecomeincreasinglyprominent.Mediationofcross-borderIPdisputesrequiresconsiderationoffactorssuchasdifferentnationallegalsystems,culturaldifferences,andbusinesspractices.Itmayalsoinvolveinternationalconventions,internationalarbitrationrules,andotherglobalframeworks,makingitmorecomplexintermsofcoordinationandresolution.其他糾紛調(diào)解OtherDisputeMediation雖然也存在涉外的婚姻家庭糾紛、合同糾紛等，但從總體數(shù)量和復(fù)雜程度上，國際性因素對(duì)調(diào)解的影響相對(duì)小于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)調(diào)解。Whiletherearealsodisputesinvolvingforeign-relatedmarriageandfamilyissues,aswellasinternationalcontractdisputes,theoverallimpactofinternationalfactorsonmediationisrelativelylowercomparedtointellectualpropertymediation,bothintermsofquantityandcomplexity.四種調(diào)解形式的區(qū)別和適用范圍DifferencesandApplicableScopeoftheFourTypesofMediationinChina司法調(diào)解

JudicialMediation與其他調(diào)解的區(qū)別Distinctionsfromothertypesofmediation由人民法院主持，具有嚴(yán)格的程序規(guī)范，調(diào)解協(xié)議經(jīng)法院確認(rèn)后具有與判決書同等的法律效力，可直接申請(qǐng)強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行。Judicialmediationisconductedbythepeople'scourts,followingstrictproceduralregulations.Amediationagreementconfirmedbythecourthasthesamelegaleffectasacourtjudgmentandcanbedirectlyenforced.適用范圍Applicablescope適用于民事案件、刑事自訴案件以及刑事附帶民事訴訟案件等。婚姻家庭糾紛、繼承糾紛、勞務(wù)合同糾紛、交通事故和工傷事故引起的權(quán)利義務(wù)較為明確的損害賠償糾紛等一般會(huì)先進(jìn)行調(diào)解。Itappliestocivilcases,privatecriminalprosecutioncases,andcriminalcaseswithattachedcivilclaims.Disputesrelatedtomarriageandfamilymatters,inheritance,laborcontracts,trafficaccidents,work-relatedinjuries,andothercasesinvolvingclearrightsandobligationsfordamagecompensationaregenerallymediatedfirst.行政調(diào)解

AdministrativeMediation與其他調(diào)解的區(qū)別Distinctionsfromothertypesofmediation由國家行政機(jī)關(guān)主持，調(diào)解主體具有較強(qiáng)的專業(yè)性，調(diào)解結(jié)果不具有強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行力，但在行政機(jī)關(guān)職權(quán)范圍內(nèi)具有一定的行政約束力。Administrativemediationisconductedbygovernmentadministrativeagencies.Themediatingbodypossessesahighdegreeofprofessionalism,andwhilethemediationresultdoesnothavebindingenforcementpower,itcarriesacertaindegreeofadministrativeauthoritywithinthescopeoftheagency'spowers.適用范圍Applicablescope用于解決與行政管理相關(guān)的民事糾紛，以及行政機(jī)關(guān)與公民、法人或其他組織之間的行政爭(zhēng)議，涉及交通事故、醫(yī)療衛(wèi)生、消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)、土地承包和環(huán)境污染等領(lǐng)域，細(xì)分為行政自由裁量權(quán)、行政裁決、行政合同等多個(gè)方面。Itisusedtoresolvecivildisputesrelatedtoadministrativemanagement,aswellasadministrativedisputesbetweengovernmentagenciesandindividuals,legalentities,orotherorganizations.Itcoversareassuchastrafficaccidents,healthcare,consumerrightsprotection,landcontracting,andenvironmentalpollution,anditincludesvariousaspectssuchasadministrativediscretion,administrativeadjudication,andadministrativecontracts.仲裁調(diào)解/商事調(diào)解

ArbitralMediation/CommercialMediation與其他調(diào)解的區(qū)別Distinctionsfromothertypesofmediation在仲裁庭/調(diào)解員主持下進(jìn)行，基于當(dāng)事人事先或事后達(dá)成的仲裁協(xié)議/調(diào)解協(xié)議，調(diào)解成功后制作的仲裁調(diào)解書與仲裁裁決書具有同等法律效力，一方不履行可申請(qǐng)法院強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行。Thistypeofmediationisconductedunderthesupervisionofanarbitrationtribunal/withtheassistanceofamediator,basedonanarbitration/mediation

agreementreachedbythepartieseitherbeforeorafterthedisputearises.Ifmediationissuccessful,anarbitralmediationstatementisissued,whichhasthesamelegaleffectasanarbitralaward.Ifonepartyfailstocomply,theotherpartycanapplytothecourtforenforcement.適用范圍Applicablescope主要適用于平等主體的公民、法人和其他組織之間發(fā)生的合同糾紛和其他財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益糾紛，如合同糾紛、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛等。Itismainlyusedforcontractdisputesandotherproperty-relateddisputesbetweenindividuals,legalentities,andorganizationsthatareequalparties,suchascontractdisputesandintellectualpropertydisputes.人民調(diào)解

People’sMediation/CommunityMediation與其他調(diào)解的區(qū)別Distinctionsfromothertypesofmediation由村委會(huì)、居委會(huì)等基層組織設(shè)立的人民調(diào)解委員會(huì)主持，具有民間性、群眾性和自治性，調(diào)解程序簡(jiǎn)便靈活，不收取費(fèi)用，達(dá)成的調(diào)解協(xié)議一般不具有強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行力，但經(jīng)司法確認(rèn)后具有強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行力。People’smediationisconductedbypeople'smediationcommitteesestablishedbyvillagecommittees,neighborhoodcommittees,andothergrassrootsorganizations.Itischaracterizedbyitsinformal,community-based,andself-governingnature.Themediationprocessissimpleandflexible,andnofeesarecharged.Themediationagreementgenerallydoesnothaveenforcementpower,butifconfirmedbythecourt,itbecomeslegallybindingandenforceable.適用范圍Applicablescope可受理包括各類民事糾紛、未違反治安管理?xiàng)l例或未構(gòu)成犯罪的民事違法糾紛、違反社會(huì)公德和公序良俗引起的糾紛、輕微刑事案件引起的糾紛以及醫(yī)患、勞動(dòng)、物業(yè)、土地、拆遷等相關(guān)糾紛。People’smediationcanhandlevariouscivildisputes,includingthosethatdonotviolatepublicsecurityregulationsorconstitutecriminaloffenses,disputesrelatedtosocialethicsandpublicmorality,minorcriminalcases,andconflictsinareassuchashealthcare,labor,propertymanagement,landuse,andhousingdemolition.運(yùn)用調(diào)解解決國際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛的步驟StepsforResolvingInternationalIntellectualProperty(IP)DisputesthroughMediation知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛調(diào)解工作進(jìn)展與成效ProgressesandAchievementsofintellectualpropertydisputemediationwork知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛“大調(diào)解”工作格局基本形成。各級(jí)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)管理部門、人民法院、司法行政機(jī)關(guān)密切配合，積極建立政府引導(dǎo)、社會(huì)參與、上下聯(lián)動(dòng)、銜接順暢的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛調(diào)解工作機(jī)制。截至2023年底，全國知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)系統(tǒng)指導(dǎo)管理的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛調(diào)解組織達(dá)1944家，較2022年增加705家。上述知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛調(diào)解組織2023年受理知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛調(diào)解案件13.5萬件，充分發(fā)揮了多渠道解紛作用。2023年，國家知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)局會(huì)同最高人民法院，首次評(píng)選發(fā)布10條知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛多元調(diào)解典型經(jīng)驗(yàn)做法和10個(gè)案例，發(fā)揮經(jīng)驗(yàn)示范和專業(yè)指導(dǎo)作用。加強(qiáng)業(yè)務(wù)培訓(xùn)，開展在線公益培訓(xùn)8期，1.2萬人次調(diào)解員參訓(xùn)。A“bigmediation”frameworkforintellectualpropertydisputeshasbasicallytakenshape.Intellectualpropertymanagementdepartments,people’scourts,andjudicialadministrativeorgansatalllevelscloselycooperatetoactivelyestablishamediationmechanismforintellectualpropertydisputesthatisguidedbythegovernment,participatedbysociety,linkedalllevels,andsmoothinconnection.Asoftheendof2023,therewere1,944intellectualpropertydisputemediationorganizationsguidedandmanagedbythenationalintellectualpropertysystem,anincreaseof705from2022.Theabove-mentionedintellectualpropertydisputemediationorganizationsaccepted135,000c