




版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
HowtoEvaluateRiskinthe
MedicalLaboratoryJamesH.Nichols,PhD,DABCC,FACBProfessorofPathology,MicrobiologyandImmunologyMedicalDirectorofClinicalChemistryandPoint-of-CareTestingVanderbiltUniversitySchoolofMedicineMedicalDirector,ClinicalChemistryNashville,Tennessee,USAjames.h.nichols@
1Objectives1.Discussthesourcesoferrorinthemedicallab2.ReviewQCasameansofcontrollinganalyticalerror3.Identifyriskmanagementasatotalqualityassuranceofthetestingprocess4.Describeregulatorychangesadoptingriskmanagementinthelaboratory
2MedicalErrorAnadverseeventornearmissthatispreventablewiththecurrentstateofmedicalknowledge.(theQualityInteragencyCoordinationTaskForce)
MedicalErrorsInstituteofMedicineoftheNationalAcademiesreport1999Medicalerrorskill44,000-98,000patientsinUShospitalseachyear.“Numberoneproblemfacinghealthcare”LucienLeape,HarvardProfessorofPublicHealthMedicalErrors2002CommonwealthFundreportestimatedthat22.8millionpeoplehaveexperiencedamedicalerror,personallyorthroughatleastonefamilymemberReinforcesthe1999IOMreport,“ToErrisHuman”Annualcostsestimatedat$17–29billionUSAgencyforHealthcareResearchandQuality(AHRQ)estimatemedicalerrorsarethe8thleadingcauseofdeathintheUS–higherthan:MotorVehicleAccidents(43,458)Cancer(42,297)AIDS(16,516)LaboratoryErrorsAreviewoftheliteraturefoundthemajorityoferrorsoccurinthepreandpostanalyticalphases.
BoniniP,PlebaniM,CeriottiF,RubboliF.ClinChem2002;48:691-698.Manymistakesarecalled“l(fā)aberror”,butactuallyduetopoorcommunication,actionsbyothersinvolvedinthetestingprocess,orpoorlydesignedprocessesoutsidethelab’scontrol.Medicalerrorsoccurinprevention,diagnosisanddrugtreatmentoccur.Amongerrorsindiagnosis;50%werefailuretouseindicatedtests,32%werefailuretoactonresultsoftests,and55%involvedavoidabledelayindiagnosis.LeapeLL,BrennanTA,LairdN,etal.NEngJMed1991;324:377-84.7HistoricalQualityControlQualitycontrolhistoricallyusedtoreduceerrorsandpreventthereleaseofincorrectresultsfromthelaboratory!Bornfromthe1950’sindustrialmodelofqualityinanalyticalandfactoryprocessesQualitycontrolisastabilizedsurrogatesampleanalyzedlikeapatientsamplecontainingknownamountofmeasuredanalyte.IftheanalyticaltestsystemcanachievethedesiredresultusingaQCsample,thenthesystemisstableandqualitypatientresultsareassumedtobeproduced.8QualityControlAdvantagesQChastargetvalues,ifassayrecoverstarget,thensystemisassumedtobestable(instrument,reagent,operator,sample)ShiftinQC=Shiftinqualitypatientresults!WarnsoftestresultproblemsbeforereleasetophysicianQualityControlDisadvantagesIfQCnotanalyzedfrequentlyenoughorlabfailstotakeactionwhenQCfails,qualityofpatientresultsaffected!Withnewautoverificationorcontinuousreleaseofresultsbychemistryandhematologyanalyzers-PossibletoreleasepatientresultsbeforeaproblemisdetectedWhenaproblemisdetected,labmustgobackandreanalyzepatientssincelast“good”QCandpossiblysendoutcorrectedresults.Clinicalactioncouldbetakenonerroneousresultsintheinterimofcorrectinganunrecognizedissue!Despiteitslimitations,QCremainsanimportantmeansofdetectingandpreventinglaboratoryerrors!1011SystematicErrorsLiquidQCdoesagoodjobatdetectingsystematicerrors,like:ReagentdeteriorationorpreparationImproperstorageorshipmentconditionsIncorrectoperatortechnique(dilution,pipettesetting)Calibrationerrors–wrongsetpoint,factorsErrorswhichaffecteverytestinaconstantandpredictablemannerErrorsthatoccurfromonepointforwardorforalimitedperiodoftime12RandomErrorsLiquidQCdoesapoorjobatdetectingrandomerrorsunlesstheerrorspecificallyoccurswiththeQCsampleorincreasedresultvariabilityisnoted.Errorswhichaffectindividualsamplesinarandomandunpredictablefashion,like:ClotsBubblesInterferingsubstances13QCandLabErrorsQCQC09:0009:00LineLeak11:0001:15HemolyzedsampleQCdailyat09:00,twolevelsLineleakoccursat11:00,dispensespartialreagentcausing25%decreaseinvalues,notdetecteduntilnextdayQCat09:00.(SystematicError),mustreanalyzeallspecimenssincepreviousQCat09:00,thepreviousday.Hemolyzedspecimen(Randomerror)affectsonesample14HistoryofQualityControlQualitycontrolhasbeentraditionalmeansofmanagingerrorinthelaboratory!CLIA’67–requireddailyQCasintegralpartoftestingprocessCLIA’88-reaffirmed“twolevelsofQCpertestperday”(bloodgasesevery8hours)CAPadvocatesdailyQCthroughinspectionandaccreditationTheJointCommissionfocusesonpatientsafetyandpreanalytic,analyticandpostanalyticprocessesISOQCRecommendations15ISO15189–5.6.1Thelaboratoryshalldesigninternalcontrolsystemsthatverifytheattainmentoftheintendedqualityofresults.Specialattentionshouldbepaidtoeliminationofmistakesintheprocessofhandlingsamples,requests,examinations,reports,etc.Documentationshouldincludequalitycontrolproceduresbasedonmanufacturerinstructionsforuse.InternalQualityControl(internaltothelaboratory)isdefinedasasetofproceduresundertakenbylaboratorystaffforthecontinuousmonitoringofoperationandtheresultsofmeasurementsinordertodecidewhetherresultsarereliableenoughtobereleased.TheregularanalysisofQCmaterialscanserveasanessentialcomponentofalaboratory’sinternalcontrolsystem.16QualityinLaboratoryTestingDespiteanalyzingtheminimumrequired2levelsQC/day,wehaveallexperiencederroneouslaboratoryresults!QualityismorethanQC!Qualityis:TestingthatissafeandreliableAppropriateuseoftechnologytomeetmedicalneedsTestresultsthatcanbetrustedformedicalmanagementAlab’sreputationdependsonqualityofitsresults!Whatshouldbethelabgoalsforerrors?UnacceptableErrorsDeaths/106enplanements 0.2PPMDeaths/106generalanesthesiainductions 2-5Viraltransmissions/106transfusions 29Results>7SD/106automatedchemtests 100Lostbags/106airplanepassengers 5000Failures/106proficiencytests 14,000Difference>5%/106hematocrittests upto 190,000WitteD&VanNessS.FrequencyofUnacceptableResultsinPoint-of-CareTesting.ArchPatholLabMed123:761,1999SigmaMetricsSigmametricsareanindustrialmeasureofqualityinafactoryprocess
-estimatesrateofdefectsinproductsGoalofsigmametrics:ImprovecustomersatisfactionBalancenumberofrejectedproductswiththeincreasedcostrequiredtoimproveprocesses(tolowerdefectrates)SixsigmaconsensusforbalancingrejectionagainsttheincreasedcostsofimprovingerrorsforindustrialprocessesSixsigmawasadoptedandpopularizedintotheclinicallaboratoriesin1990’s18SigmaPerformanceNeedforQualityLaboratoryTestingLaboratorytestinginfluences>70%ofallmedicaldecisions.>7billionlabtestsconductedintheU.S.annually
SilversteinMD.Anapproachtomedicalerrorsandpatientsafetyinlaboratoryservices.AwhitepaperpreparedfortheQualityInstituteMeeting,MakingtheLaboratoryaPartnerinPatientSafety.DivisionofLaboratorySystems,CentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention,April2003./mlp/qiconference/
BeyondSixSigmaWith>7billiontestsconductedintheUSannually,sixsigma(3.4defects/milliontests)meansreleasing23,800incorrectlabtestsannuallyintheUS!
Anysingleresulterrorcouldmeanamisdiagnosis,failuretotreatanillnessorincorrecttreatmentselection!Viruscontaminationofbloodproduct,IncorrectcancerdiagnosisMissedheartattack!Whatifthatwrongtestresultbelongedtoyouorafamilymember?Foramedicallaboratory,sixsigmaisanunacceptablegoal!Weneedtogo“beyondsixsigma”forlaboratoryperformance,withagoalofZEROerrorsthatreachthepatient!2122RiskDefinitionRisk–thechanceofsufferingorencounteringharmorloss(Webster’sDictionaryandThesaurus,1993Landoll,Ashland,Ohio)RiskisthepotentialforanerrortooccurRiskDefinitionISO/IECGuide51–RiskcanbeestimatedthroughacombinationoftheprobabilityofoccurrenceofharmandtheseverityofthatharmRISK=(Frequency)x(SeverityHarm)x(Detection)↑numberoferrors=greaterrisk↑harm=greaterriskInabilitytodetectanerror=greaterriskRiskissimplyaratingscaletoranktheorderforaddressingpotentialerrorsinlab(withlimitedavailableresources)23MedicalErrorsThePersonEasiertoblameapersonthananinstitutionforerrors.Inaviation,90%ofqualitylapsesarejudgedtobeblameless.TheSystemActivefailuresduetopersonalinteractionwithsystemLatentconditions,weaknessesinsystemduetodesignflawsorheirarchicaldecisionsNeedtoengineersystemsthatpreventdangerouserrorsandareabletotolerateerrorsandcontaintheireffectsReasonJ.BMJ2000;320:768-770.IdentifyingRiskintheLaboratoryThereisno“perfect”device!AnydevicecanandwillfailundertherightconditionsEverydeviceisdifferent!(universal2levelsQC/daydoesn’tfiteverysituation,mayneedmorefrequentQC–especiallyiffrequentstaffturnoverorunstablereagent)Anydiscussionofriskmuststartwithwhatcangowrongwithatest(errors)Labtestsarenotfool-proof,forasufficientlytalentedfool!26CLSIProject:EP23LaboratoryQualityControlBasedonRiskManagement.JamesH.Nichols,Ph.D.,ChairholderEP23describesgoodlaboratorypracticefordevelopingaqualitycontrolplanbasedonmanufacturer’sinformation,applicableregulatoryandaccreditationrequirements,andtheindividualhealthcareandlaboratorysetting27EP23LaboratoryQCBasedon
RiskManagementMedicalRequirementsforTestResultsTestSystemInformation:ProvidedbythemanufacturerObtainedbytheLaboratoryInformationaboutHealthCareandTest-SiteSettingInputInformationProcessRiskAssessmentOutputLaboratoryDirector’sQCPlanPostImplementationMonitoringContinuousImprovementRegulatoryandAccreditationRequirementsCLSIEP23TableWhereistheRiskin
theProcess?28WhatCouldPossiblyGoWrong?IdentifyingRiskintheLaboratoryFollowthesamplethroughthetestingprocess!Ateachstep,ask“Whatcouldpossiblygowrong?”Foreachhazardidentified,defineamitigationstep,awaytominimizetheriskoferroroccurring!Summarizethehazardsandactionsinaqualitycontrolplan!29StepsoftheTestingProcessPatientNeedforTestOrderPatientPreparationSpecimenCollectionLabReceiptAnalysisResultVerificationAcknowledgeResultOrderTreatmentTreatmentPreanalyticalPostanalyticalTransporttoLabAnalyticalProcessingFishboneDiagramfromCLSIEP23…RefertoAppendixAinCLSIEP18formorecomprehensivelistoferrorsourcesSourcesofLaboratoryErrorTestSystem:Reagentcontamination,deterioration,lotvariationReactionfluctuationsInadequatesamplingImproperorlossofcalibrationElectronicormechanicalfailurePowersupplyEnvironment:TemperatureandairflowHumidityLightintensityAltitudeOperator:Improperspecimenprep,handlingIncorrecttestinterpretationFailuretofollowtestsysteminstructionsCLIAInterpretiveGuidelinesforLaboratories.AppendixC,SubpartK.§493.1256Standard:ControlProcedures.InterpretiveGuidelines§493.1256(a)–(c)./Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/CLIA/Interpretive_Guidelines_for_Laboratories.html
33RiskManagementHolisticorglobalapproachtoqualityassuranceincorporatingpreanalytic,analyticandpostanalyticphasesoftestingEveryinstrumentordeviceisdifferentHazardanalysisandmitigationHazardanalysisdefinesthesourcesofpotentialerrorforaninstrumentordevice
andameansofdetectingorpreventingtheerror(mitigation)34ManufacturerChecks–AlternativeQCSomedeviceshaveinternalcheckswhichareperformedautomaticallywitheveryspecimen:Developmentofaline(Pregnancytest,Occultblood)Sensorsignal(bloodgasanalyzer,clots)Flowresistanceandliquidsensors(clotsorbubblesinchemistryandhematologyanalyzerpipettes)Otherchecksengineeredintoinstrument:Barcodingofreagentexpirationdates(preventsuse)LockoutfeaturesthatrequiresuccessfulQCDisposableanalyzercuvettes/pipettetips(carry-over)Temperatureindicatorinshippingcarton35QCandRiskManagementAnalyzerReagentFluidics,pipetting,electronics,motorsSomeinternalchecksdetectmechanicalandelectronicfailuresChemistryofreactionIntricatelylinkedwiththeanalyzerSusceptibletoenvironmenteffects36QCandRiskManagementTwolevelsofQCeachday,detectserrorsfrommanysourcesAnalyzer(pipets,mechanical,electrical)Reagent(storage,drift)Operator(calibration,dilution)Environment(reagentandsample)Automatedanalyzershavemanypartsandsourcesoferror,notallofwhicharedetectedbyinternalchecks.QCdoesagoodjobofdetectingsystematicerrorsthatpersistintime,butmayfailtodetectrandomerrorsoccurringwithsinglesamples.Randomerrors,likehemolysis–requiresserumindicesonchemanalyzer,visualsampleinspectionand/orphlebotomisttrainingforsamplecollectionissues37PointofCareQCandRiskManagementDeviceTestCartridgeReadstestcartridgesignalInternalelectronicchecksmaintainreaderwithinnarrowspecificationsChemistryofreactionContainsfluidics,calibrant,internalQC38QCandRiskManagementDeviceOnlyreadssignalElectronicscheckenvironment(temp)anddeviceintegrityLocksouttestingwhenoutsidespecificationsTestCartridgeActsastheanalyzerRiskfromenvironmentandoperatoreffectsQConcartridgeevaluateschemistrywitheachtestAdditionalcontrolprocessesforsampleandforoperatortechnique39QCandRiskManagementQCisexpensive,consumesreagentandlaborwithoutproducingresultsthatcanbebilled.ThepresenceofengineeredcontrolprocessesonnewerPOCTdevicesraisethequestionofwhenandhowthesecontrolscansubstitutefortwolevelsofliquidQC?Howtobestcontrolunit-usePOCTdevices?LabDirectormustbalancerequirementsforQC(2levels/day)againstcostandavailabilityofalternativecontrolswithinthetestsystemRiskmanagementandwalkingthroughthetestingprocesstoidentifyhazardsandsourcesoferrorcanhelplabsidentifytherightbalanceofliquidQCwithengineered-builtincontrolprocessesonthedevicesIndividualizedQualityControlPlanIndividualizedQualityControlPlanRiskAssessmentQualityControlPlanQualityAssessment40CLIANewIQCP
CLIA,CAPandJointCommissionRequirementsTwolevelsofliquidQCrequiredeachdayoftesting
ORLaboratorydevelopsanIndividualizedQualityControlPlan(IQCP):Balancebuilt-incontrolprocesseswithliquidQCReducefrequencyofliquidQCtominimumrecommendedbymanufacturerMaximizeclinicaloutcome,availablestaffresourcesandcosteffectivenessinthelabConsidersthelaboratoryprocessfortestingandriskoferrorsateachstepofthetestingprocess!41WhatHaveWeLearnedFromOurIQCP?QCwasexcessive.Past,i-STAT,QCthedevice(x27i-stats)-separatetestsystemsLotshipments(testoneachdevice)MonthlyQCcartridges(oneachdevice)6monthcorrelations/linearities(eachdevice)BUT…Chemistryisinthecartridge–shouldvalidateeachlotofcartridgesusingsubsetofi-stats(whicharejustreaders)Rotatei-statsHighmidandlowQClevelssameas3vialsinlinearityset–sodon’tneedtopurchaseseparatelinearity42Before:(QCthedevice)Shipments= 3QCx5daysx6x/yr= 90testsQCmonthly= 3QCx27i-stats= 81testsLinearities= 27i-statsx3levelsx3repsx2x/yr= 486tests6mocorrelations=10patientsx27i-stats= 270tests
TOTAL= 927testsAfter:(QCthecartridges,centralizedshipments)Shipments= 3QCx6x/yr= 30testsQCmonthly= 3QCx5lotcartridges(max)x12=
180testsLinearities= alreadydonemonthlyasQC= 0tests6mocorrelations=5pts/shipmentx2old/newx6x/yr= 60tests TOTAL=270testsSavingsof657cartridgesperyear43WhatHaveWeLearnedFromOurIQCPs?FalselyDecreased
GlucoseMeterResultsComplaintfromanintensivecareunitofsporadicfalselydecreasedglucosemeterresultsImmediaterepeattestonsamemeter,gavesignificantlyhigher“clinicallysensible”valuesInspectionofunitfoundnursestakingproceduralshortcutstosavetimeBottlesofteststripsdumpedoncounterinspareutilityroomSomestripsnotmakingitintotrash,fallingbackoncounterandbeing“REUSED”44RiskofErrorfrom
OpenReagentsGlucoseteststripsexposedtoairforaslittleas2hourshavebeenshowntocause-26%bias.1Stripsleftoncountersposeriskofreuse,leadingtofalselylowresults.Somemeterscatchreuseand“error”preventingaresult.Othermetersdonot!245KefferP,KampaIS.Diabetes1998;47;abs0170.SilvermanBC,HumbertsonSK,StemJE,NicholsJH.Operationalerrorscauseinaccurateglucoseresults.DiabetesCare2000;23:429-30.ReagentErrors:ExpiredReagentsCentersforDiseaseControl“Checkandrecordexpirationdatesofreagents/kits,anddiscardanyreagentsorteststhathaveexpired.”1U.S.FoodandDrugAdministration“Checktheexpirationdateonthet
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2025福建漳州市漳浦縣金瑞集團招聘20人考前自測高頻考點模擬試題完整參考答案詳解
- 2025黑龍江哈爾濱鐵道職業(yè)技術學院輔導員招聘5人考前自測高頻考點模擬試題參考答案詳解
- 滄州市中醫(yī)院腎功能支持技術準入考核
- 2025北京首都醫(yī)科大學附屬北京中醫(yī)醫(yī)院招聘22人(第二批)考前自測高頻考點模擬試題參考答案詳解
- 2025年延邊大學急需緊缺教師崗位招聘(3號)(47人)模擬試卷附答案詳解(考試直接用)
- 滄州市中醫(yī)院疑難病例分析處理考核
- 2025年威海技師學院公開招聘工作人員(29名)考前自測高頻考點模擬試題附答案詳解(黃金題型)
- 2025國網中國電力科學研究院有限公司第二批高校畢業(yè)生錄用人選的模擬試卷及完整答案詳解
- 2025貴州銅仁市萬山區(qū)事業(yè)單位引進高層次及急需緊缺人才12人模擬試卷及答案詳解(典優(yōu))
- 2025江西南昌市勞動保障事務代理中心招聘勞務外包人員1人模擬試卷及答案詳解(考點梳理)
- 寵物樂園方案
- 自備車補貼申請表
- 注塑成型技術培訓之工藝理解課件
- 信息論與編碼(第4版)完整全套課件
- 廣西佑太藥業(yè)有限責任公司醫(yī)藥中間體項目環(huán)評報告書
- 汽修廠安全風險分級管控清單
- 海綿城市公園改造施工組織設計
- 上體自編教材-體育運動概論-模擬
- 05625《心理治療》案例分析
- GB/T 2679.7-2005紙板戳穿強度的測定
- GB/T 25840-2010規(guī)定電氣設備部件(特別是接線端子)允許溫升的導則
評論
0/150
提交評論