HollywoodWriterChangestheScriptontheSmokingBy:Bunny

EmmaZeroAnalysisofthearticleAnessayReflectionSummaryTherearemanyHollywoodproductionsfeaturingsmokingmanorwomanasbeingsexy,glamorous,mysterious,andsoon.However,recentyears,somescriptwriters,whohaveindulgedinthecancer-causinghabit,repentferventlyandbecomestaunchanti-smokingcampaigner.AndAustralianfilmmakersthinkthewaysmokingportrayedintheirfilmsisfarcryfromHollywood’sblatantpromotionofcigarettes,becausethefilmisarealisticportrayaloflife.Nevertheless,audiencedoubtthiskindofrealityandcomplainthepublic’sexposuretosmokingandtobaccoproducts.

Paragraph4~18PeoplediffertheiropinionsonEszerhasaction.Paragraph19~22Australianfilmmakersthinkthewaysmokingportrayedintheirfilmsisthereflectionofreallife.Paragraph23~26Audiencedoubtthiskindofrealityandcomplainthepublic’sexposuretosmokingandtobaccoproducts.Paragraph1~3ThescriptwriterJoeEszerhasregretsthemovie’sgratuitousbuttandurgeHollywoodtorethinkthewayitpresentssmoking.1234ThemeDiscussionShouldmoviesportraysmokingthisway?Question:ThethreemostpopularbrandsofcigarettesamongAmericanteenagersareMarlboros,Camel,andNewport,whicharealsothethreemostheavilyadvertisedbrandsofcigarettes.Isthereanycorrelationbetweenthem?Explain.Myopinion:Thereiscloserelationshipbetweenthem.AdvertisingProhibitionActshouldaimtolimitthepublic’sexposuretosmokingandtobaccoproductsbycontrollingtheairingofcigarettecommercialsonTV.Intheforth,madeupoffourarticles,unite,therearethreearticlestalkingaboutoutlawingsmokinginpublic,however,Istillagreewiththelastone,theonlyoneofwhichsupportsallowingsmokinginpublic.Therearethreereasons.Ithinkmanypeopleamongushaveeverheardthatsmokingisbadforhealthandthemostdangerousandharmfulelementintobaccoisnicotine,whichisnotstrangetous,however,whattheharmandhowharmfulaboutnicotineisonlyhearsay,takeaneighborofsomeone’sauntdiedforsmokingtoomuch.Butallaboutthedamagenicotinehasdonetoourbodyisthesecondmaterial.Ananonymouspersonevenclaimsthattobaccoisgoodforhealth,likeimprovingmemoryandkeepingfit,thoseconclusionsofwhicharepublishedbyanauthoritativeresearch.So,what’syouropinions?Whethertobaccoisharmfulornotisunclear.Then,thereisonethingoftenbeingignorantbypeople,ifthelawtobansmokingisdeliveredonecenturyago,manymasterpiecessuchasLuXunandMarkTwainwillbekilledincradle.ThemarkofLuXunofhisportrait,besidesblackandsickbeard,isthecigaretteheldinhisfingers,whichperfectlyshowshisdeepthinking.Veryoften,atthetimeofLuXunfailedtocontinuehiswriting,hewouldliketohaveacigarette,andwithspiralsofsmogaroundhim,theinspirationofwritinglikesaspringfountain.So,inmanycases,smokingisbenefitforourcreation.Stimulatingournerveswhenwefeeltiredorlackofinspiration,tobaccoisexpertinthis.

Finally,justasDr.TheodoreGill(apersonmentionedinthefortharticle)claims,whyshoulditbethebusinessofgovernment?Publicsmokinglawsare“inflicted”bysingle-mindedpersonswholooktogovernmenttosolvepersonaldifferences.Byallthese,Idon’tagreethatit’snecessarytooutlawsmokinginpublicinchina.Ofcourse,sometimesthesmelloftobaccoissmoky,butit’snotseriousenoughtobansmoking,buildingspecialroomsforsmokersareok.ReflectionWhatdoallthesehavetodowiththeincreasingnumberofteenagerssmoking?Shouldmoviesportraysmokingthisway?1234TherelationshiphasbeenportrayedaboutstarsandcigarettesinHollywoodmovies.Theyhaveenjoyedalongandlusciousrelationship.Smokinghasbeenahelpfultooltorevealsexappeal,mystery,andstyle.AustralianfilmmakersholdadifferentviewfromJoeEszterhas.Theythinkwhetheracharactersmokesornotshouldbedecidedbythecharacter’spersonality.1234Thedifferencebetweenafilmmakerandasocialworker.Filmmakersarefaithfultotheirart.Theiraimistoportrayacharacterorpersonalitytrulyandhonestly.Ontheotherhand,socialworkersshowgreatconcernforpeople,andwhatisgoodforhumanbeings.

DoesHollywoodwriterchangethescriptonsmoking?Itdepends.But,mostimportant,bepractical.Actionsspeaklouderthanwords.Theurgenttaskonhandistobringaboutchange.

Limitingthepublic’sexposur