070203Environmentalproblemssuchasice-meltingandgreenhouseeffecthavebecomesevereincreasinglyinthelastdecades.Somepeoplearguethatonlygovernmentsandlargecompaniescanaddressproblemswhilepeoplearetoolimitedtomakeadifferenceonthisissue.Frommyownperspective,notonlyauthoritiesandbigenterpriseshavecapacitiestomodifythisconditionbutalsoeverypersoncanbeautifyoursurroundingsneatandtidy.Tobeginwith,weshouldshouldertheobligationtotakecareofouruniqueandsingleearth.Ifrubbishwerethrownhereandthere,theglobewouldbecomeahorriblegarbageyard,anirreversibledisastertowardsthewholeeco-system,whichishardlyimagined.Bycontrast,theentireworldwouldbealteredmoreharmoniousandcleaneratmosphereduetoenvironmentalprotectioninmindandpracticalactions.Furthermore,it’swidelyacceptablethatcitizens’notionshaveapositiveimpactongovernments’environmentalstrategyandcompanies’decisions.Forinstance,thesuggestionofsavingindustrialwaterconsumptionarousedbyaregionoraunionmightbeappliedbygovernmentsthroughenactinglawstoconductthemeasure,however,whicheventuallywillbecarriedoutbysingleindividuals.Theauthoritiesandlargefirmshavethepossessiontocontributetoourenvironmentalimprovementaswell.Itiscompanies’sufficientresourceslikewealth,brandinfluencethatfacilitatestheprotectionmoreeffectively.Theycouldraisepublicawarenesseasilythroughsomeapproaches,e.g.,Publicserviceadvertising,whichpeoplecannotaccomplishbyone’saspiration.Nonetheless,theentireenvironmentalcareerstillreliesonindividual’sdevotion.Insummary,bothpartsofpowersneedtobetakenseriously.Peopleactingasparticipantsbringaboutthechangereflectedbytheaccumulatedsmalleffortsofeverycitizen.Meanwhile,thegovernmentandcompaniesalsoplayaleadingroleinenvironmentalchallenges.Onlybyacombinationofallsidesofcontributions,theworldcanbeecological,balanced,andpeaceful.070210Whilethisstatementistrueformostofgenerationsastheyareeasytofindrelevantwebarticles,theydoneedtheknowledgeforgoofing(internetsurfing)tobeabletosearchtheinformationintermsofeffectivenessandefficiency.However,imaginethatoneneitherhavecomputerskillnorITknowledge,thisstatementmaybetooharshforthem.Themainpurposeforapubliclibraryisnotonlyborrowingbooksbutalsotoservethecommunity’sneeds,suchas,bookclub,readhardcopyofmagazinesandnewspapers,senior’sgettingtogether.Thisbenefitprovidesbythepubliclibrariesinoursocietyshouldnotbeunderestimated.bbs.3Thecomputertechnologyhasnodoubtatallreplacedmostoffunction,thatis,wecanreadbooksfromtheacademicdatabase;newspapersandpublishesfromalmosteverywhere,thismeansthatwedonotneedmanyhardcopiesandenvironmentfriendlyfortheearth.HoweverIamnotsomuchconvincedthatpubliclibrariescanreplaceotherfunctionsthatweneedotherthanprovidinginformationorbooks.Theimportantissueweneedtorecognizeisthattherearenotmanypopulationwhocanusecomputertoservetheirneeds,andevenmaynotaffordtoownacomputer.Someofthemareusingthepubliclibrariesforreadingthelargeprintbooks;othersarecomingtorelaxforreadingmagazineswithfriends;andtheothersmayjustcomeforacoolspotinahotsummer.

bbs.3Governmentsintheworldaretryingtoimprovenations’lifestyleineveryaspects,inthiscase,howcanitbesatisfactorytosaythattakeawayapubliclibrarybyreplacingacomputerisimprovingourqualitylife.(282words)

070303Childrenareputinaparticulargradeaccordingtoageinoureducationsystem.Itis

obviousthatallchildrenarenotofthesameintelligencelevelandsometimesit

becomesdifficultforeducatorstoteachtheminthesameclass.Therefore,some

peoplefeelthatthereshouldbeseparateteachingforintelligentstudentsandweak

students.Ifwelookatthebenefits,thenyes,intelligentstudentscanbetaughtattheirpace

andthesessionscanbemademoreinterestingforthemandthesamethingappliesto

theweakstudents.Thus,boththecategoriesofstudentswouldenjoylearning.

Moreover,differentteachingtacticscanbeadoptedineachgrouptogivestudents

maximumbenefits.Inamixedgroup,manytimesweakstudentscannotcopeupwith

thepaceofstudiesandsocomeunderhighpressureandgetde-motivated.When

theyareseparated,teacherscanhandlethemtactfullyandbringthembackthelost

confidence.Furthermore,ithasbeenseenthatsometimesthemoreintelligentstudentsshow

disruptivebehaviour.Theycangraspthingsverysoonandthendisturbtheothers.It

canbecomeverydifficultfortheteachertomaintaindisciplineintheclass.Ontheotherhand,weakstudentswouldautomaticallydevelopaninferioritycomplex

iftheyaremadetorealisethattheyareweakinstudiesbyseparatingthem.In

additiontothat,theothergroupmightnottreatthemwell,whichcanhaveadirect

effectontheirpsyche.Onthecontrary,whenthestudentsstudyinamixedgroup,a

senseofcompetitiondevelopsandweakstudentsaremotivatedtostudy.Even

intelligentstudentscanhelpweakstudentsinstudiesandthebondcanbe

strengthened.Thisway,evenweakstudentswouldnotfeelbelittled.Inmyopinion,childrenshouldnotbeseparatedasonlyacademicabilitiesarenot

enoughtojudgetheintelligenceofthestudents.IwouldrathersuggestwhatIhadin

myschool,andthatisextracoachingtoweakstudents.Itservesthepurposebestas

teacherssavetheirtimeandenergyandyetmaintaintheeffectiveness.070310Intoday’sworld,thetechnologyhasimprovedsignificantly.Sincetheinnovativeadvicessuchmobilephonesorcomputershasinvented,ithasmanyimpactstohumanlivesinmanyways.Thesegadgetscanextendtohumanbeings,whileotheragreethatithassomedrawbacksandcanleadtodisappearoftraditionalliteracyskillssuchaswritingletter.Frommyperspective,Idoagreewiththisstatementforseveralreasons.Firstly,sendingtextviamobilephonesorcomputersismucheasierandveryconvenientthanwritingletters.Typingshortmessagesonahandyphone,sendingthemanddeliveringtorecipientsarespendingonlyafewminutes.Usingtechnologicaldevicestransfermessagescandowheneverwritersfeellikewhichareveryconvenientunlikesendingtextbytraditionways.Withwritingaletter,writershavetoactuallywritedownonapieceofpaperwithapenorpencil,enclosewithanenvelopeandattachwithastampwhicharerequiredsometimetofinishalltheprocess.Secondly,therearemanyalternativeoptionsfromusinge-mailsandtextmobilephonewhichareveryinteresting.Thesedays,writerscanbeabletosendalargefileorattachwithsomephotosormusicalongwithmessageswhichmakeabetterwayforcommunication.Manyhappybirthdaycardsorsomespecialeventinvitationscanbeeasilytakenbysendinge-cardsonline.However,withthetraditionwayofcommunication,peoplewillnotbeabletosendmessagesinotherselectiveoptions.Lastly,theuseofmobilephonesandcomputerscansavealotoftimethansendingletters.Ifpeoplesendurgentmessagesvialetters,Itwilltakeatleastaweekforrecipientreceivingmessages.However,usingmobilephonesfortextingconsumesonlyafewsecondsandallurgentinformationcandeliverytoareaderquickly.Withouttheinnovativecommunicatingmethods,itwouldbeverydifficulttosendmessageintraditionalways.Inconclusion,eventhoughwritinglettershassentimentalvaluetorecipients,withthehigh-techofdevicesithasmanymeritstoallcommunicationsinthemodernworld.Preservingtraditionalwritinglettersisveryinevitablethesedaysanditisreplacedbyalltechnologicalmethodssuchase-mail,eventually.070322Peoplehaveavariedopinionwhetherthegovernmentshouldassistafinancialsupporttotheartistsornot.However,whileitistruethatthegovernmentshouldhelpartists,Iwouldarguethatspendingmoneyonartistsisnotawasteofmoney

Itisoftensaidthatartformsareanintegralpartofthenation'sculturalheritage.Theymaintainthatbyprovidingfinancialassistingtoartists,thegovernmentcanhelpprotecttheculturalheritageofthecountry.Moreover,theypointouttheadventoffilmsandtelevisionhasconsiderablyaffectedthepopularityofotherartforms,andwithoutsuchsupportfromthegovernmentscouldmeanthatmanyethnicartformswilldieout.

However,despitethisargument,Iwouldarguethatspendingmoneyonartsandartistsiswastefulasthereareseveralothersectorsthatdesperatelyneedgovernmentfunding.Forexample,inmanyundevelopedanddevelopingcountriesmillionsofpeopledonothaveanaccesstosafedrinkingwater,andevenpropereducationformanychildrensbeyondreach.Meetingtheserequirementsisfarmoreimportantthanprotectingthenation'sartformsfromextinction.

Inconclusionitendtofeelthatthegovernmentsupportinartsisunjustified,andtherefore,couldbebetterspendonotherdevelopmentfactorswhicharemuchneeded070331TheavailabilityandapplicationofmoderndevicesandtoolsofcommunicationslikeFaxmachines,telephone,interactiveTVandcomputerhavebroughttremendousconvenienceandefficiencytobothlifeandwork.Thankstotelecommunications,dailytasksandbusinesstransactionscanbeperformedwithoutmeetingotherpeopleinperson.Thispracticecertainlyhaspositiveeffectsontheindividualandthesocietyasawhole.Undoubtedly,e-shoppingande-bankingmakelifemoreconvenientthaneverbefore.Peoplecanstayhomecomfortably,lookingontheInternetwhereavastseaofinformationisavailabletofindwhattheyneed.TheyLogontotherelevantwebsitesandlookfordetailedinformationontheproductsandservicesthattheyareinterestedin.Theyreadthedescriptions,examinethepictures,andchecktheprices.Eventually,theymakeadecisionandsendane-mailtoorderandpayforitbye-banking.Allcanbedoneathome,withoutscanningnewspaperadvertisements,readingreferenceprintmaterials,goingarounddowntownastheydidbefore.Asaresult,theyhavemoretimetotakepartinsocialactivities,pursuehobbiesandinterestsandcommunicatewithfamilies,whichareallindispensablepartsofqualitylife.Thetrendofdoingbusinessbytelecommunicationsequallybenefitsthewholesocietybecausebusinesscanbedonemoreefficientlyandeffectivelyatamuchlowercost.Anextrabenefitisthatmorenaturalresourcescanbesaved.Moreover,smallbusinesseshavealmostthesameopportunitiestoadvertiseandpromotetheirproductsandservicesonlinetocompetewiththoselargeones,whichmakesthewholesocietyfairer.Tosumup,performingeverydaytasksandbusinesstransactionsbymeansoftelecommunicationsbenefitstheindividualandthesocietyenormously.Thereissimplynogoingback.070414Itisafactthatadvertisementsarenowwidespreadonmassmedia.Somepeoplebelievethatthesedonotserveanybeneficialpurposesandevenspoilthesociety.Thereshouldbeanadvertisingrestrictiontohindertheirnegativeimpactsoncustomers.Soeverythinghasitsownprosandconsandthatiswhysomeonerightlysaidthatallthatglittersisnotgold.Itisunderstandablethatpeoplewanttoremoveadvertisementsfromourlivesbecauseadvertisementscanbedisturbing,thereforethepumpingoutofadvertisementontheinternetisdistractivewhendoingresearchonlineandinsertionofadsduringTVdramasandmoviesisobnoxious.Moreover,advertisementsaresometimesmisleadingandcauseimpulsivepurchasethustheexaggerationandeye-bindingtechniquesemployedintheadvertisementovershadowthetruefunctionofproductsandtheconsumers,especiallytheyoungpeople,wouldfallvictimstothisintensivecommercialcompletion.Ontheotherside,itisirrefutablethattheproponentsofadvertisementarguethatitisunfairtobanadvertisementbecauseitistheonlyefficientandviablewaytoshowtheirproducts.Iftheadvertisementiseradicatedthenthelinkbetweenproductsandconsumerswouldbecutoff.Withoutadvertisement,companieswouldfindithardtoreachouttotheircustomers.Consequently,giantcompanieswouldmanipulatethemarketandsmallcompanieswouldneverbeknownbythepublic.Furthermore,advertisementprovidesmoreoptionstoconsumers.Todrawtheconclusion,Ipendownbystatingthatadvertisementisdisturbingnowandthen,thereisrealisticneedofit.Thegovernmentshouldmakethemmoretrustworthy.Nowadays,theadvertisementisaninescapableandnecessaryexistence.070421Televisionscreens,newspapers,buses,andalmostallcitystreetsarefloodedbyallkindsofadvertisements.Thishasbothadvantagesanddisadvantagestoconsumerswhoareunavoidablyinfluenced,thoughthedegreesvaryfrompersontoperson.Becauseoftheadvertisementsplacedbymanycompetingcompanies,consumersareabletolearnaboutcertainnewproductsrapidly.Ifaproducthappenstobewhatsomeconsumersneed,theymightbeattractedtomakeapurchaseandhavetrials.Ifitturnsouttobereallygood,peoplewouldsetaboutrecommendingittofriendsandthesalesofthisproductwillgoupveryquickly.So,weseethisisawin-winsituationbothtoconsumersandmanufacturersandwealsoseethatconsumersarenotjustinfluencedprofoundlyallatonce.Ittakestimeforthemtoestablishfaithintheadvertisedproducts.Inmostcases,theadvertisedproductsaregoodandworthbuying.Buttherearealsocaseswheretheeffectsorfunctionsofacertainproductaremuchexaggeratedanditwilldefinitelyfoolsomepeoplewhentheyareattractedallatonceandgotobuyit.Sinceaproductcanonlywinthemarketthroughitsqualityanditslongestablishedfame,there’severyreasontobelievethatthosefakeormuchexaggeratedproductswilleventuallylosetheirmarketsharesanddieout.Thus,weseethatthemarketisselectiveandconsumersaresensibleinthelongterm.Indevelopedcountries,therearestrictcensorshipandsupervisingsystemsregardingadvertising.Iftheadvertisementsputupbyaccompanyfailstohonortheadvertisedeffects,itwouldbetermedasfraud,thusviolatingthelawwhichcouldleadtoreallyseriousresult.Inmostcases,themanufacturingcompanywouldbefinedsoheavilythatitwouldbedifficultforittosurviveanylonger.Fromtheforegoingdiscussion,wecanseethatadvertisementsinfluenceconsumersbothfavorablyandunfavorablyandthedegreesofthisinfluencedifferfrompersontoperson.Toprotectconsumers,governmentscanfollowthepracticeofdevelopedcountriesbyenforcingreallystrictcensorshipandsupervisinglawsinregardtoadvertisingasawhole.070428Airtransportiscommonlyusedtomovefruitsandvegetablestoplaceswherethosefarmproductscan’tgroworareoutofseason.Thebenefitsofsuchbusinessareobvious,butairtransportalsocreatesanumberofproblems.Transportoffruitsandvegetablesbyairenablesconsumerstoenjoyawidervarietyoffreshandin-seasonfarmproductsfromallovertheworld.Notonlyisairtransportgoodforconsumers,itisalsoablessingforfarmersbecausethemarketisnolongerrestrictedbyregions.Asaresult,airtransportincreasesthesalevolumebysellingmoreproductsinmoreplaces.Moreover,airtransportoffoodhasnowbecomeamajorresourceofincomesforaircompanies.Inthepast,aircompanies’businessmainlycamefromservingpassengers.However,facinganincreasinglytoughmarket,aircompaniesneedtoexpandtheirshareofmarkettoserveawiderrangeofcustomersinordertostayinthegameandmakeaprofit.Withaboomingeconomyandmoremoneytospend,peoplecreateagreatpotentialforfoodtransportbusinessandgoodmarginforaircompanies.Inspiteofsuchbenefits,airtransportisnotfreeofproblems.Onemajorissueishighcost.Airtransportisprobablythemostexpensivewayoftransport.Highercostsentailhighprices,whichinturndeprivepeoplewithlessmoneytheopportunitiestoenjoysuchprivileges.Soairtransportedfoodisnowfortherich,afactthatisunfairforpoorpeople.Inaddition,itisnotthebestoptiontosolveproblemsbytransportingfoodfromoutsideforplaceswherecertainkindsoffruitsdoesnotgrow.Themostoptimalway,itseemstome,isthatweshouldchangetheenvironmentrequiredbysuchplantsusingscientificandbiologicalmethodssuchascreatingsuitablesoilandtemperature.Suchsolutionswillbeproventobeultimatelycost-effectiveandfundamental.Moreimportantly,researchindicatesthatairtransportpollutestheenvironment.Forexample,Britaintransportshalfitsfoodbyair.HoweveronekiloNewZealandfruitemitsfivekilowarmhousegasonitswaytodestination.Therefore,someenvironmentalgroupsandbooksadvocatepeopletodistinguishlocalfruitandair-transportedfruitinanefforttocutthepollutionfromfoodconsumption.Inconclusion,airtransporthasmanybenefitsforconsumersandfarmers,butitalsohasproblemssuchashighcostandpollution.Moreeffectiveandenvironmentalfriendlysolutionshouldbefoundtoaddresssuchproblems.070512Itisarguedthatvolunteeringshouldbemadepartoftheschoolcurriculum.Thisessayagreeswiththatsuggestioncompletelybecauseofthebenefitsitbringstopupils.Theessaywillfirstlookathowvoluntaryworkcanhelpstudentsdevelopsoftskillsandthendiscusshowtheseextracurricularactivitiesarevaluedbyuniversitiesandemployers.Educationshouldnotbelimitedtostrictlyacademicpursuitsandthoseineducationshouldalsodeveloplifeskills,suchasteamwork,empathyandself-discipline,andoneofthebestwaystohonetheseaptitudesisthroughcommunityservice.Servingthoselessfortunatethanourselvesteachesusmanylessonsincludinghowtoworkwithpeoplefromotherbackgroundsandthevalueofhardwork.Forexample,Ipersonallyvolunteeredtospend6weeksinAfricateachingdisadvantagedchildrenandthisledtoamuchhigherworkethicwhenIreturnedtomystudies.Manycollegesandcompaniesarealsoincreasinglylookingforthistypeofexperience.Mostschoolleavershavethesamegradesandcharitableworkscanhelpsetyouapartfromtheherd.Forexample,CambridgeandOxfordreceivethousandsofapplicationsfromstraight-Astudentseveryyearandcanonlyacceptasmallpercentageofapplicants.Whatyouhavedoneoutsidetheclassroomisoftenthethingthatdifferentiatesyoufromeveryoneelseandgetsyouthatcovetedspot.Inconclusion,teenagersshouldbemadetopartakeinunpaidworkaspartoftheirschoolingbecauseitwillhelpthemlearnthingstheywouldn’tordinarilylearnfromtheirteachersanditwillalsoboosttheirchancesofgettingintothirdleveleducation.070519Thesedays,theamountofpeopleusingcomputerisincreasinglyoverwhelming,whichisjustifiedbythebenefitsofthistechnologydevicebringstoourlives.Itisevidentthatthisdeviceplaysacrucialroleintermofeducationinsomeaspects,though,theplaceofteachersstillremaintheirimportanceinothersareas.Inthisessays,Iwillanalyzeboththeeffectiveroleofteachersaswellascomputersonthefieldofeducation.

Thisisundeniablefactthatineducation,computerisbeingusedasatoolthatprovidepeoplemanyusefulfunctions.Forexample,inearliertime,peopleentailedlong-hourstayinginthelibraryforresearchingandlearning,though,nowadays,itissimplydealtbytheclickofabuttonwhichcanaccesstoavarietyofvaluablematerial.Also,contactingwithfriendsthroughcomputersbyusingInternetisnotonlyfastbutalsoacheapwaytotradingandtalkingaboutstudyingmaterial.Moreover,school'scouncilcaneasilycontactwiththeirstudentsbypostingnewsorimportantnoticesintheirofficialwebsite.

Ontheotherhand,theimportantpresenceofteacherinsomeareasofeducationisimpossibletoreplacebyanymachineincludingcomputers.Havingbeentaughtbyahumanbeing,studentshaveatendencytobemoreconcentrateonthematerialandrespectful.Also,teachers,whospendtheirtimetointeractandinstructtostudents,areeasilytorealizeeachstudents'deficienciesandtheircapacitiestodesignthesuitableinstructionsaswellasencourageandprovidethemmanyusefuladvice.

Toconclude,bothusingcomputersandbeingtaughtbyteachershavetheirownessentialcontributionsintermofeducation,whichbynomeanscanbereplaced.Hence,onlywhencontrolledbalancebetweentwomethods,canthefieldofeducationdevelopperfectly.070602Nowadays,anincreasingnumberofimpoverishednationsarefocusingonthedevelopmentoftourism.Thereisnodoubtthattourismisbecomingacrucialindustryinallcountries.

InsomesoutheasternAsiandevelopingcountriessuchasThailandandIndia,tourismhastackledtheunemploymentproblemforlocalinhabitantstosomeextent.Morespecifically,itevenstimulatetheeconomyaswell.Furthermore,tourismhasbeenalternativetoagricultureforlocalresidents'suvival.Andthisisthemainreasonwhythesedevelopingstateshighlightthesignificantoftourism.

Nevertheless,nothingcanbeimmunefromcriticism,thenegativeshouldnotbeignored,includingtourism.Althoughtherearesomepositiveeffectfordevelopingnations,butthelocalnaturebalancemightbebrokenbynumeroustourists,Chinaisagoodexampleforthis.AvastnumberofpoeticandpicturesquetouristsightshasnolongerbeenattractiveinChina.Worsestill,someofthemhavebeenpermanentlyvanishedfromthisplanet.Additionally,theforeignculturemayhaveanenormousimpactonlocaltraditionalcustoms,andsomelocaldwellersmaygraduallyabandontheiruniquecustomsjustforahigherlivingstandard.Asaresult,theauthoritieshavetomakegreateffortstoprotecttheseendemiccustoms.

BasedonwhatIhavementionedabove,Ithinkthenegativeimpactoftourismoverweighsitspositiveforanimpoverishednations.Economycanbepromotedthroughothermethods,howevernationalenvironmentcannotbeeasilyrecovered.Thenaturalresourceisafortuneweborrowfromourdescendantsratherthanaheritageinheritedfromancestors.070609宣稱歷史文物和藝術(shù)作品都可以從電腦上看到，因此公共博物館和藝術(shù)畫廊便不再需要了簡直就是荒唐。It

is

simply

absurd

to

assert

that

with

historicalobjects

and

works

of

art

being

able

to

be

seenthrough

a

computer,

public

museums

and

artgalleries

will

no

longer

be

needed.首先，電腦永遠(yuǎn)替代不了真正旳公共博物館和藝術(shù)畫廊。不管電腦影像何等真實、形象，它們?nèi)匀粌H僅是影像而已，不是我們真正看到旳、甚或還會被許可用指端觸摸一下旳歷史文物和藝術(shù)作品。對于那些聲稱由于可以從電腦屏幕上看到想看旳一切，因此博物館和藝術(shù)畫廊沒有繼續(xù)存在必要旳人們，我想提議他們就從電腦里娶個太太或者嫁個丈夫得了，犯不著去娶嫁真實生活中旳人！First

of

all,

computers

can

never

replace

real

public

museums

and

art

galleries.

No

matter

howreal

and

vivid

computer

images

are,

they

are

only

images,

not

the

historical

objects

and

worksof

art

that

we

see

in

real

or

even

might

be

allowed

to

touch

with

our

fingertips.

For

those

whoclaim

museums

and

galleries

are

no

longer

needed

because

they

can

see

all

they

want

to

on

acomputer

screen,

I’d

like

to

suggest

that

they

marry

a

wife

or

husband

in

the

computer

ratherthan

in

real

life!另一方面，參觀真實旳博物館和藝術(shù)畫廊在多方面有益。一來可以鍛煉身體：在我們趕往博物館或者藝術(shù)畫廊并漫步現(xiàn)場旳過程中，我們得到了某些鍛煉，這對我們旳身體健康有諸多好處。二來我們可以大飽眼福，親眼看到那里旳所有物件并切身體會那種神奇、美妙和精湛旳工藝。這個過程是積極地看我們想看旳一切，不是被動地去看他人在電腦屏幕上展示給我們旳。再來就是我們離開電腦去現(xiàn)場觀看真實物件可以保護(hù)我們旳視力。In

the

second

place,

visiting

real

museums

and

art

galleries

is

a

rewarding

experience

in

manyrespects.

For

one

thing,

it

is

a

good

exercise.

While

we

are

making

the

trip

to

a

museum

or

artgallery

and

then

strolling

about

on

site,

we

get

some

exercise

which

does

a

lot

of

good

to

ourhealth.

For

another

thing,

we

can

feast

our

eyes

on

all

kinds

of

things

there

and

experience

thewonder,

beauty

and

exquisite

workmanship

with

our

own

eyes

in

an

active

way

instead

of

in

apassive

manner

by

looking

at

what

are

being

displayed

to

us

by

others

on

the

screen.

For

yetanother

thing,

we

protect

our

eyesight

by

moving

away

from

the

computer

screen

and

see

thereal

objects

on

site.電腦給我們旳生活帶來了諸多以便，這是真旳。有時候，尤其是當(dāng)我們臨時不能親臨博物館和藝術(shù)畫廊時，我們可以大概理解一下現(xiàn)場都展示了哪些東西。然而，我們從電腦屏幕上看到旳與我們現(xiàn)場親眼看到和感受到旳畢竟是不完全同樣旳。It

is

true

that

computers

have

brought

greatconveniences

to

our

life.

At

certain

times,

especiallywhen

it

is

temporarily

impossible

for

us

to

visitmuseums

and

art

galleries

in

person,

we

can

get

arough

picture

of

what

are

on

display

on

site.However,

what

we

see

from

a

computer

screen

is,after

all,

not

exactly

the

same

as

what

we

see

andfeel

with

our

own

eyes

on

site.由此我們可以得出結(jié)論：電腦永遠(yuǎn)不也許替代真實旳博物館和藝術(shù)畫廊。因此，說不需要去博物館和畫廊了由于歷史文物和藝術(shù)作品都可以通過電腦屏幕來欣賞了是荒唐旳。In

conclusion,

computers

will

never

be

able

to

replace

real

public

museums

and

art

galleries.Therefore,

it

is

ridiculous

to

say

that

one

does

not

need

to

go

to

museums

and

art

galleries

ashistorical

objects

and

works

of

art

can

be

appreciated

on

a

computer

screen.070616In

the

cotemporary

world,

compared

with

traditional

foods,

an

increasing

number

of

people

prefer

international

fast

foods.

And

when

it

comes

to

effect

of

that

fact,

there

is

no

doubt

that

it

raises

a

huge

debate.

What

is

more,

as

a

matter

of

the

fact,

the

number

of

person

who

holds

the

point

that

it

has

negative

influence

on

our

life

is

more

than

the

one

who

puts

forward

to

the

opposite

view.

As

for

me,

the

phenomenon,

traditional

foods

being

replaced

by

international

fast

foods,

is

harmful

to

our

families

and

societies.

Two

reasons

are

as

follow.

First

and

foremost,

it

is

generally

agreed

that

different

kinds

of

traditional

foods

represent

different

periods

of

historical

culture.

As

we

all

know,

protecting

our

culture

is

our

responsibility,

especially

as

a

qualified

citizen.

Therefore,

it

is

understandable

that

we

should

shoulder

the

obligation

to

preserve

the

traditional

foods.

Moreover,

from

the

point

of

my

view,

in

terms

of

the

nutritive

value,

it

is

obvious

that

traditional

foods

are

better

than

international

fast

foods.

Personally

speaking,

health

is

of

value

as

well

as

significance.

Furthermore,

it

is

an

old

saying

goes

that

health

is

to

our

life,

as

water

is

to

fish

or

sun

is

to

living

things.

Hence,

I

firmly

believe

that

the

trend

is

not

benefit

to

our

life.

Admittedly,

international

fast

foods

have

some

advantages.

It

is

generally

acknowledged

that

fast

foods

are

convenient

as

well

as

time-saving.

As

the

development

of

society

and

economy

in

the

last

decade,

it

is

the

efficiency

that

we

pay

attention

to.

As

a

result,

living

in

a

world

of

speed,

having

fast

foods

is

an

wi