




版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
WorkingPaperNo.1084
MMT:HeuristicsversusParadigmShift?
by
L.RandallWray
LevyEconomicsInstitute
July2025
ThisisaslightlyrevisedversionofthepurposelyprovocativekeynotepresentedattheFDRlibraryfortheLevyInstituteSummerSeminaronMoney,Finance,andPublicPolicy.Referenceshavebeenadded.
TheLevyEconomicsInstituteWorkingPaperCollectionpresentsresearchinprogressbyLevyInstitutescholarsandconferenceparticipants.Thepurposeoftheseriesistodisseminateideastoandelicitcommentsfromacademicsandprofessionals.
LevyEconomicsInstituteofBardCollege,foundedin1986,isanonprofit,nonpartisan,independentlyfundedresearchorganizationdevotedtopublicservice.Throughscholarshipandeconomicresearch,itgeneratesviable,effectivepublicpolicyresponsestoimportanteconomicproblemsthatprofoundlyaffectthequalityoflifeintheUnitedStatesandabroad.
LevyEconomicsInstitute
P.O.Box5000
Annandale-on-Hudson,NY12504-5000
Copyright?LevyEconomicsInstitute2025Allrightsreserved
ISSN1547-366X
Mainstreameconomicsisindisarray.AsFrankHahnremarkedfourdecadesago,“Themost
seriouschallengethattheexistenceofmoneyposestothetheorististhis:thebestdeveloped
modeloftheeconomycannotfindroomforit.”HewasspeakingofGeneralEquilibriumtheory,buthisclaimappliesequallywelltoDynamicStochasticGeneralEquilibriumtheory,whichisusedbyallthemajorcentralbankersoftheworldtomodeltheeconomy.
Letthatsinkin.Ourcentralbankersuseamodeltounderstandtheeconomythathasnomoney,nobanks,andnofinancialsystem.TheQueenofEnglandaskedwhynoneofthemainstreamersforesawtheGlobalFinancialCrisis.Theirfailurewasbakedintotheirmodel.
Remarkably,eveninsidersattheFedrecognizethedismalfailureoforthodoxy.JeremyRudd
beganarecentFedresearchpaper,claiming,“[n]obodythinksclearly,nomatterwhatthey
pretend[…]that’swhypeoplehangonsotighttotheirbeliefsandopinions;becausecomparedtothehaphazardwaythey’rearrivedat,eventhegoofiestopinionseemswonderfullyclear,sane,andself-evident”(Rudd2021).
Hegoesontolistideasthat“‘everyoneknows’tobetruebutthatareactuallyarrant
nonsense”—includingallthemainideasoforthodoxtheory.Theyareallnonsense.Allacceptedasdogma.
ToparaphrasewhatKeynessaidacenturyago,mainstreamtheory’sapplicationisnotonly
limitedtoaspecialcase(i.e.,aneconomythatdoesnotusemoney),butisalsodangerouswhenappliedtothe“factsofexperience”toformulatepolicy.Theevidenceisplaintoseeallaroundus:inaneraofmultiplepandemicsthatthreatenthecontinuedexistenceofhumanlifeonplanetEarth,wearestymiedbyimaginaryconstraintsconcoctedbyeconomists.
Overthepast30years,ModernMoneyTheory(MMT)gotmuchofitright.Itsproponents
foresawthefatalflawsoftheeuro.Theypredictedtheoncomingglobalfinancialcrisisand
warnedthatthepolicyresponsewouldbeinsufficient,sotherecoverywouldtakemuchlonger
thannecessary.AndwhentheCOVID-19pandemichit,theyofferedapolicyresponse—targetedspendingtoaddressproblemswithoutsettingoffinflation.
Inthatlastcrisis,atleastsomepolicymakerslistenedtoMMT.FormerCongressmanJohn
Yarmuth(D-KY),ChairoftheHouseBudgetCommittee,hadembracedMMTandhelpedto
usherthroughtrillionsofdollarsofpandemicreliefwithoutworryingabout“pay-fors.”Ashe
correctlyargued(asquotedinWray2021),“Historically,whatwe’vealwaysdoneissaid,‘Whatcanweaffordtodo?’Andthat’snottherightquestion.Therightquestionis,‘Whatdothe
Americanpeopleneedustodo?’[…]Onceyouansweredthat,thenyousay,‘Howdoyouresourcethatneed?’”
Hewentontoarguethat,astheUSgovernmentissuesitsowncurrency,financeisnevertheproblem.Whatmattersisresourceavailability.
AsMMTpredicted,trillionsofdollarsofdeficitsdidnotcauseinterestratestospike,orthedollartocrash,orattacksbybondvigilantes,anddidnotforcetheUSgovernmenttodefault.
Allthefinancewaskeystroked,allthetreasury’scheckscleared,allthebondsweretaken-up,andthedollarremainedstrong.Thedeepestrecessiononrecordwasreversedwiththefastestrecovery.MMTwasinthenews,again,butthistimeoccasionallywithapositivespin.The
pandemicresponsewasclaimedtobethefirstrealworldexperimentthatappliedMMT.
However,thepandemiclingeredonlongerthanmostexpected—withcontinuedsupplychain
disruptions,newviraloutbreaks,organizedpoliticalresistancetoscience,andprice-gougingbymega-corpswithpricingpower.
Inflationrose.MMTwasblamed.Intruth,thepolicieswerenotwhatweadvocated—spendingwasnotwell-targeted,jobswerenotcreateddirectly,capacitywasnotenhanced.
AsYarmuthwarned,alleyesneedtobefocusedonresources,notonfinance.
Achiefarchitectoftheneoliberalworldorder,LarrySummers,announcedwithfurythathewasoffendedthatthe“newspaperofrecord”woulddevotespacetoMMT:“Iamsorrytoseethe
nytimestakingMMTseriouslyasanintellectualmovement.Itistheequivalentofpublicizingfaddiets,quackcancercuresorcreationisttheories.”
1
JasonFurman—afavoriteofDemocraticadministrations—fumed:“Idon'tthinkMMTmakesanysense.Ialsodon'tthinkit'splayedaroleinshiftingusondeficits.”
2
Andnow,ofcourse,wearebacktothedeficits—twoofthem(tradeandgovernmentbudget),
bothchronic,bothseeminglyintractableproblems.AsIhaveexplained
,3
thetwoareinextricablylinked,althoughnotinthewaythatconventionalanalysisclaims.
IdothinktheyhavebecomeaproblemandIthinkMMTneedstoclearlyaddressthem.Too
oftenMMTproponentshaverespondedtocriticswithsimpleheuristics—alistoftalkingpointsthataremeanttorepresentdescriptionsofreality—freedoftheoryorpolicyrecommendations.
WhileheuristicsareusefulinintroducingMMTtobeginners,theycannotsubstituteforcarefuleconomicanalysis.Wemighthavereliedonthemexcessively.
Letmegivesomeexamplesofproblematicheuristics:
?Taxesdrivemoney
?Governmentspendscurrencyfirst,thentaxesitback
?Importsareabenefit,exportsareacost
?Bondsalesarejustareservedrain
?Governmentsetsthepricelevel
?Floatingexchangeratesmaximizedomesticpolicyspace
?There’snofinancialcrisissogreatthatfiscalpolicycannotresolveit
1
/LHSummers/status/1490424193611141121.Accessed5November2022
.
2JasonFurman:
/jasonfurman/status/1083394281547722752
.TheNewYorkTimesarticlealsostated,“’M.M.T.wasalreadyprettymarginal,’saidJasonFurman,aHarvardeconomist,notingthat,inhisview,mostpolicymakersandprominentacademicsignoreditalready.”(Accessed5November2022.)
3
/publications/ratings-agencies-downgrade-the-dollars-exorbitant-privilege/
Whilethere’sakerneloftruthineach,allarehistorically,theoretically,andpractically
problematic.Eachfollowslogicallyfromcarefullyconstructedassumptions.Nonestrictlyappliestotheeconomyweactuallylivein.
ItisoftensaidthatMMTismainlyadescriptionofthewaythingswork—andthattheoryandpolicycanbeaddedasdesired.I’veevensaid(Wray2024a)thatMMTisforAustrians,too!
Iwanttowalkthatback.Descriptionwithouttheoryisnotpossible.Theorywithoutaparadigmisnotpossible.Weneedaparadigmtoformulatetheory,andatheorytoformulatedescription.Oncewehavegotallthat,onlythenwecantacklepolicy.
BoththeUniversityofMissouri—KansasCityandtheLevyInstitutehaveplayedabigrolein
thedevelopmentofMMTandshareaparadigmthathasshapedourapproach.I’llbrieflyoutlinethebuildingblocks:
?FromMarx,Keynes,Veblen,Minsky:Marx’sM-C-M’;Keynes’sMonetaryTheoryofProduction;andVeblen’sTheoryofBusinessEnterprise.
?FromtheInstitutionalists(VeblenandMinsky):moneyisallboundupwithpower:todogoodandbad;MoneyisthemostimportantinstitutioninCapitalistEconomy
?Fromthe(Post)Keynesians(Keynes,Davidson,andMinsky):moneyanduncertainty;Moneyandcontracts;Holdingmoney“quellsthedisquietude”(asKeynesputit);
Endogenousmoney
?FromtheChartalists(Knapp,Innes,Goodhart,andMinsky):statemoneyandcurrencysovereignty
?FromFunctionalFinance(LernerandMinsky):statemoneyandtheapproachtofiscalandmonetarypolicies
?And,finally,theSectoralBalancesapproach(GodleyandMinsky):focusonbalancesheetsandmacrobalances;balancesdobalance!
TOGETHER:thatisMODERNMONEYTHEORY
AsMinskyusedtosay,ageneraltheoryisuseless.WhileKeynescalledhisrevolutionarybookTheGeneralTheory,Minskyarguedittobeamisnomer—itisatheoryofthecapitalisteconomywheremoneyplaysaspecialrole.
JamesK.GalbraithhasarguedthatKeynespurposefullyborrowedhistitlefromEinsteinashewastryingtodoforeconomicswhatEinsteinhaddoneforphysics.
Buteconomiesarefarmorecomplicatedthanthephysicalworld.Manyheterodoxeconomistsarguethatbiologyisabetteranalogybecausethelivingworldisalwaysevolving—fromapastthatwecansortofunderstandtoanunknowablefuture.ThatbettercaptureswhatKeyneswasdoing—aDarwinianRevolution.
AsMinskyinsisted(Wray2017),capitalismevolves—thereare57varieties—andourtheorymustcontinuallyevolvealongwiththefactsofexperience.
Moneyisatleast5,000yearsold,asDavidGraeber(2012)claimed,anditsrolechanged
significantlyoverthosethousandsofyears.Formostofeconomiclife,moneydidn’tmattermuch—untilmoderncapitalismwasincubatedbytheNewWorld’sslaveryonthebacksofcapturedAfricans.
Allthemoderninstitutionsweassociatewithcapitalismcameoutofslavery—modernfinance,administration,accounting,labordiscipline,policing,andwarfare,aswellasthepeculiarformtakenbyAmericandemocracy(Wray2025a).
Thus,ourtheoryneedstobeinstitution-specific.Ourparadigmismonetaryproduction:unlikeinallpreviouseconomicsystems,thepurposeofproduction—fromtheperspectiveofthosein
control—istostartwithmoneytoendupwithmoremoney.Satisfactionofneedsisnotthegoalofthosewhocontrolcapital.
Weneedacountervailingpower—touseGalbraithian(1956)terminology—toensurethatneedsaremet,whichcanincludegovernment,laborunions,andsocialserviceorganizations.
Governmentincapitalisteconomieshasalwaysservedtwomasters—thecapitalistsandtherestofus.
Lefttoitsowndevices,capitalismishighlyunsustainable—economically,socially,
environmentally,andpolitically.Unliketribalsociety—whichcouldsustainitselfforthousands,maybemillionsofyears—capitalismwouldself-destructwithinagenerationifitwere
abandonedtotheinvisiblehand.
Thatiswhatwesaw,withdepressionafterdepression,onceeverygenerationuntilRoosevelt’sreformsandthecreationofBigGovernmentwithwhatMinskycalledManagerialWelfareStateCapitalismandwhatGalbraithcalledtheNewIndustrialState.
Initsmodernguise—whichwecandateto1870(whatRobertGordonusesasthedateforthe
beginningofthe“specialcentury”)—capitalismhasgonethroughfourorfivestagesaccordingtoMinsky.Thisfinalstage,MoneyManagerCapitalism,hasrunitscourse.Westandattheedgeofacliff,withnobottominsight.
Trumpwantsustojumpoff.
LetmereturntotheheuristicstoexplainwhyIbelievetheypresentobstaclestofurtheradvancesinMMT.Iamonlygoingtotackleahandfulofthemhere—butIthinkthatmanyothersalso
needtobecriticallyassessed.
TaxesDriveMoney.Wehaveoftenusedthemetaphorofthecolonistwhoimposesataxinhisowncurrencyandenforcespaymentwithhisgun.Therearecertainlyhistoricalexamples,in
Africaforexample.
AndweoftenusetheAmericancolonies—thatwouldpasstwobills,oneimposinganewtaxandtheotherauthorizingtheissueofpapercurrency.Allthisistrue.Butmoneyalreadyexisted—
thiscannotbeanoriginsstoryanddoesn’tshedtheproperlightonitsnature.
Moneyhasexistedfor5,000yearsatleast.Asbestaswecandeterminefromhistoricalevidence,itwasinventedasaunitofaccounttomeasuredebts,forinternalrecordkeepinginthetemplesofBabylonia(Hudson2018).Thiswasbeforeevidenceoftaxesormarkets.
Whatdifferencedoesthismake?Thefirstdrawsattentiontoillegitimateforce—theevilcolonizer.Moreimportantly,itemphasizesmoneyassomethingthatexchangeshands:
governmentspendsacurrencythatthencanbeusedtopaytaxes,makepurchasesinmarkets,orhoardforlateruse.
Thesecondemphasizesrecordkeeping,creditsanddebits.Moderngovernmentsdonotspend
physicalcurrency,andtaxpayersuseonlytrivialamounts.MostofitisoutsidetheUS—usedforillegalactivity.Youngpeopletodayhaveneverboughtanythingexceptbyflashingtheirsmart
phone.
AndtheUSgovernmentneverspendscurrency,atleastinAmerica.Washingtonspendscashwhentheyinvadeacountryandwanttopaymercenariesorbribeofficials.
IusedtomakefunofaprominentPostKeynesianwhoobjectedtoMMTbeforearoomfulof
legalhistorians,saying:“IneverthinkoftaxeswhenIacceptaUSdollar—Iacceptdollars
becauseIwanttobuyicecream.”WealllaughedatthesuperficialcritiqueofMMT’sclaimthattaxesdrivemoney.
Butthecomplaintresonateswith99percentofthepopulation—whoneverthinkoftaxesasdrivingtheirdemandformoney.Theywanticecream.Andtheydon’tusecurrencytobuyit.
Weneedtomoveawayfromthinkingaboutmoneyassomethingthatgoesfromhandtohand.
Thebettermetaphoristhebaseballscoreboard,withbanksreplacingtheBabyloniantempleas
thescorekeepers.Moneyisn’tsomethingthatyouhaveordonothave.Itisallaboutkeeping
trackofdebitsandcredits.And,asMinskysaid,anyonecancreatemoney—theproblemistogetitaccepted.Thequestioniswhetherthescorekeeperwillgiveyouacredit.
AsMinskysaid,banksarenotmoneylenders.Theymakepaymentsfortheircustomers.The
“money”iscreatedwhentheymakethepayment.Banksfollowrulestodeterminewhethertheywillmakeapaymentforyou.Andtheytallyupwhatyouowe—justastheDeviltalliesyoursinstodeterminewhetherhetakesyoursoul.
Thecentralbankisthescorekeeperforthescorekeepers,andalsoforthegovernment.Italsofollowsrulesthatdeterminewhenandhowitwillmakepaymentsforbanksandthetreasury.
Moneyisnotsomethingofwhichthegovernment,thecentralbank,banks,oryoucanrunout.AsMatForstatersays,thedollarisliketheinch(orcentimeter)—wecannotrunout.
IwanttoaddressthreeadditionalareaswhereIthinkoverlysimplisticlogicleadsdownthewrongpath—atleastwhenitcomestodevelopinganunderstandingofthewayourformofcapitalismworks.
First,thereistheclaimthatasmonopolysupplierofthecurrency,governmentcansetanyandallprices.Thelogicfollowsfromthetaxes-drive-moneyassumption.Byimposinganobligationonyou,governmentdetermineswhatyoumustgiveuptogetthecurrencytopayyourtax.AsI
haveargued(Wray2024b),thissoundsalotlikethelabortheoryofvalue:ifittakesanhourtoearnadollar,thenthedollarisworthanhouroflabor.
Thisisthemainideabehindthebufferstockapproachtothejobguarantee:governmentcanmaintainabufferstockofworkerspayingabasewagetopreventthewagefromfallingand“selling”labortoprivateemployersatamarkupoverthat.
Byanalogy,governmentcandothesameforeveryotherthingboughtandsold.
Well,whatwouldthatlooklikeintherealworld?Arealmess.PeoplejokeabouttheSovietUnion’sattempttoregulatemarketpricesbutthiswouldbethatonsteroids.
Itiscompletelyinconsistentwithcapitalism.
AndasIhavetriedtomakeclear(Wray2024b),thebasicwage—thewageforordinarylabor—willnotmapdirectlytoprice.Capitalismoperatesaccordingtoalogicthatgenerallytriesto
equalizeratesofprofitandexploitation—notaccordingtothewhimsofagovernmentthatwantstosetallprices.
Thesecondclaim—thatwecanalwayscounterafinancialcrisisbyrampingupfiscalpolicyiswrongforthekindoffinancializedeconomywehadbothinthegildedagebeforetheGreat
Depression(oftencalledFinanceCapitalism)andsincetheunravelingoftheNewDeal
institutions—beginninginthe1970s.ThisMoneyManagerCapitalismstage,witheverythingfinancializedis—tousethemetaphoragain—financeonsteroids.
TheFedspentandlent$29trilliondollarstosaveglobalfinance(Felkerson2011).Thenextfinancialcrisismighttakeevenmore.
Youcouldsay:well,justletthewholedarnedfinancialsystemfail.Therealeconomywillstillbehere.That’swhatwedidintheGreatDepression.AsMinskyusedtosay:yes,theeconomymightrecover,butbywayofhellfirst.
Tobeclear,Idon’tsupportthewaytheFedresponded—itwasamess,muchofitwasillegal,andnoneofWallStreet’scriminalclasswasprosecuted.Themoneymanagerscameroaringbackandrebootedthebubbliciouseconomy.
Butmerelyrampingupafiscalresponse,alone,wouldn’thavesavedourpensionfunds,our
investmentsinourhouses,orouruniversityendowments.Evenexcludingallthefancy
derivativesandothercrazyfinancialproductsthattotaluptothehundredsoftrillionsofdollars,wehavefinancialassetsthatareatleastfivetimesgreaterthantheso-calledrealeconomy.
Wehavetokeepinmindthat,incapitalism,thefinancialismorerealthanthereal.Thisisasystembasedonproducingmoneyvalue,notonedirectedatsatisfyingneeds.
I’dliketochangethat—butweneedtoapproachitsensibly,notbybringingonanotherGreatDepression.
Finally,there’stheMMTdismissalofthetwindeficitsproblem.Sincegovernmentcannotrunoutofmoney,budgetdeficitsaren’taproblem—wemightaswellrunthemup.Withafloatingcurrency,tradedeficitsareasignthatwearewinning:wegetthestuff,theyonlygetdollars.
Trumpsayswearelosing;MMTsayswewin.
Minsky’swritingsduringtheReaganyearsshowedgreatconcernaboutbothdeficits.Thishas
ledsomeMMTproponentstoarguethatMinskycannotbeaguidinglightforMMT.Ihave
discussedMinsky’sviewsonthisintwoLevypublications(Wray2018;2025b).Letmequicklysummarizehispoints.
Creationofalargeandchronictradedeficitmeans—bythesectoralbalancesidentity—thatwewillhavealargeandchronicbudgetdeficit.
Minskywasworriedthatrivalcurrenciescouldsubstituteforthedollar,soitsvaluecouldfall—potentiallyirreversibly—forcingtheFedtokeepinterestrateshigh,whilealsoputtinginflationpressureontheUS.Thecombinationcouldleadtosecularstagnation.
Whatwesaw,however,isthatourtworivals—GermanyandJapan—bothdroppedoutoftherunning.
Germanycommittedsuicidebyjoiningtheeuroandembracingausterity;Japan’sprivatesectorranoutofsteamandstoppedinvesting,inpartbecausethegovernmentalsoembracedausterityinanattempttobalancethebudget.
Inthemeantime,theUSlostitsindustrialadvantage(firsttoGermanyandthentoAsia).Thiswasonlypartiallyduetotrade—ithadmoretodowithfinancializationoftheeconomy—butcontributedtoinequality,theweakeningoflaborunions,andtheriseofneoliberalism.
WedidgetthesecularstagnationthatMinskywarnedof,onlyrelievedbyserialbubbles—asMichaelHudson(2014)said,webecameaBubbles-R-Useconomy.Proppedupbyserial
bailoutsbytheFedandgrowingbudgetdeficits.
Fortwodecades,theFedkeptrateslow,fuelingthebubbles,butsinceCOVID,theFedhaskeptthemhigh.Andthatmeans—asMinskywarned—thatmoreandmoreofgovernment’sspendingisinefficient—goingtointerestandtransferpayments,withmuchofthespendinggoingabroad.
ThejokeisthatUncleSamisnowjustanarmywithawelfaresystemattachedtoit.ContrastalltherecentpresidentswithFDR:hisgovernmentmadeAmericagreat.Hisaccomplishmentsarestillallaroundus.
Reagansuccessfullyconvincedusthatgovernmentisaproblem,notasolution—andthe
Democratshavelargelyreinforcedthatbeliefbydoinglittletonothingtohelptheworkingclass(TchernevaandWray2025).
And,yet,theDOGEtechboyscouldnotfindanywastebecausewehavecreatedthemostefficientwaytorunaninefficientsystem.
AsIsaidearlier,Minskyworriedaboutsecularstagnation.WetemporarilystavedthatoffduringtheClintonyearsandforsometimeafterbyboostingfinance—tothebenefitoftheFIREsector(finance,insurance,andrealestate)andwhatCitigroup(Kapur,Macleod,andSingh2005)calledthenewPlutonomy—thosebillionaireswhohavetakenoverthegovernmentandtheeconomy.
AhandfulofcountiesaroundtheUSboomedwhilemostofthecountrygotleftbehindand
turnedred—asPavlinaTchernevaandIhaveshown(2025)—evenasTrumpandMusktrytoturnthecountryintoabananarepublic,withTrump’sfavorabilityratingsomewherearound40percent,theapprovalratingoftheDemocratsisstuckat27percent.
AmajorexceptiontothestagnationwasSiliconValley:overthepasttwodecades,techisthesectorthatboomedalongsideWallStreet.Interestingly,someoftheearlytechfirmswere
involvedinthepaymentssystem.ThathascomefullcirclewiththesecondcomingofTrump.Thisis,Ithink,thetrueaimofDOGE—tomergethefinancialandtechsectors,tofinancializeourdata.
Wenolongerliveinaworldofproductionofcommoditiesbymeansofcommodities
4
—
including,mostimportantly,laborpower.Capitalismisstilldrivenbythequestfor“more
money”butthemainsourceisnotproductionofcommodities.Thelabortheoryofvaluedoesn’tstrictlyapply:monetarywealthhasbeenfreedfromproduction.Neitherincomenorprofitflowsareimportantforourplutocrats—asinvestigationsbyProPublica(Eisinger,Ernsthausen,and
Kiel2021)haveshown.BillionaireslikeMuskpaynoincometaxesbecausetheyhavenoincome.
DataisnowthemostimportantcommodityintheworldandDOGEhasapparentlydeveloped
thecapacitytomergeallthedatacollectedbythegovernment(includingtheIRS),banks,socialmedia,andtheinsurancesector—especiallyhealthmanagersthatdenyyourclaimsandstartupsthathaveyourDNAandallotherhealthrecords—intoaone-stopshoppingmallforsaletothehighestbidders(Randles2025;Chayka2025).
DOGEgotholdofthepaymentssystemandcanpushtheredstopbuttononanypayment.TheytesteditonNewYorkCity—theyactuallyshutdownpaymentsthatCongressapprovedtohelpwiththecostscreatedbytheclowngovernorofTexaswhobussedimmigrantsanddumpedthemonthecity(Tankus2025).
TheTrumpadministrationhaspaidover$100milliontoPalantir(FrenkelandKrolik2025)to
consolidateallthegovernment’sdataonindividuals,presumablytomakeiteasiertogoafterthemillionsofAmericanswhocouldbeaddedtoanenemieslist.Tousethemetaphoronemore
time:thiscouldbeNixon’senemieslistonsteroids.
4AsSaffraputit.
AmIparanoid?Itisastrangenewworld.Capitalismisasystembasedonexploitation.While
Marxfocusedonexploitationoflabor,capitalismalsoexploitstheenvironment,thefamily,the“others”outsideitssystem.Buttheproponentsoftechforeseeanear-futureinwhichlaborisnolongerneededasAIincreasinglytakesoveralltasks.
Theydon’tneedyourlabor,theyneedyourdata,andmaybeyoureyeballs.
AI’smostimportanttasknowistoaccumulateallthedatainexistence.Whatthen?Itwillknoweverythingweknow;itwillbeabletodoeverythingwecando.AndMMTteachesthatitwillbeabletoaffordtodoso.
Maybeweshouldkeepthatasecret?
ButIdon’twanttoendonthatnote.Letmeconclude.
Conventionalmacroeconomictheory—ofboththeorthodoxand(unfortunately)ofmuchoftheheterodoxvariety—takesanexcessively“highinthesky”view.
Unemploymentiscausedbytoolittlespending.Inflationiscausedbytoomuch.Keepingtaxesaligned—moreorless—withgovernmentspendingensuresitwillnotbeinflationary.The
solutiontoinflationistocutspendingorraisetaxes.
MMTisdangerousbecauseitletsthecatoutofthebag:taxesdonotfinancegovernment
spending.Thisgivespoliticiansalicensetorunupspendingthatwillcauseinflation.Besttokeepthewoolpulledovertheeyesandinsistontax“pay-fors,”orlettheDOGEboysstopthepayments.
MMT’sviewisdifferent.Thecompositionofbothtaxesandspendingmatters,andsotherearetworeasonsthattryingtomatchthemismisguided:(1)governmentdoesn’tneedtherevenue,
and(2)thereisnoreasontobelievethatmatchingthemmeansgovernment’simpactapproachesneutral.
Spendingonunemployedresourcesputsthemtoworkwithlittleinflationaryconsequence.
Spendingonafixedprice-floatingquantitybasisreducesfurthertheinflationarydanger.(ThatiswhattheJobGuaranteedoes.)
Spendingtoincreaseproductivecapacityalsoreducesthedangerofinflation,andcanraisethedangerofdeflation.Clearly,notaxhikesarerequiredinthatcase—wemightneedtaxcutsifproductivecapacitygrowstoexceedwhatcanbesupportedbyspending.
Agoodexampleishealthcare:MedicareforAllwouldcutspendinginhalf—fromover18
percentofGDPtoperhaps9percent,theamounttypicallyspentbyotherrichcountries(WrayandNersisyan2020).Wewouldneedabigtaxcuttooffsetthedisinflationaryimpact.
Likewise,itmatterswhatkindoftaxisimposed.Afinancialtransactionstax,orabillionaire
wealthtax,orataxsurchargeonmillionairesisunlikelytotakeasignificantamountofdemandoutoftheeconomy—nomatterhowmuchrevenuetheyraise—soarenotlikelytoreduce
inflation(WrayandNersisyan2020).
Forgetbillionairetaxestoraiserevenue.Instead,taxbillionairestodestroytheirwealth—imposea120percentwealthtaxtotakeallofit,andsendthemabillfortherest.Incentivizethemtotrytoworktheirwayoutofthedebt.
Ontheotherhand,abroad-basedincomeorconsumptiontaxwillreducedemandsignificantly.
Othermethodscanalsobeusedifdesired:rationing,patrioticsaving,orpostponedconsumption.
AllthisisimportanttosupportatransformativeGreenNewDeal—oranyotherlargescale
governmentinitiative.AsYarmuthinsisted,wen
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 二零二五年度物流企業(yè)設(shè)立出資協(xié)議書(shū)
- 二零二五年智能家居家居定制房屋半包裝修服務(wù)協(xié)議
- 二零二五版家電產(chǎn)品線上線下銷售代理合同范本
- 二零二五年度存量房交易個(gè)人住房買賣合同范本
- 2025版智能防盜門與相關(guān)配件購(gòu)銷合同
- 2025版工程測(cè)量與地理信息系統(tǒng)集成服務(wù)合同
- 二零二五年度黃牛養(yǎng)殖戶與銷售商購(gòu)銷合作保障合同
- 2025版智能穿戴設(shè)備銷售保密合同范本
- 2025版新能源汽車銷售及售后服務(wù)合同模板
- 2025抵押物綠色建筑項(xiàng)目貸款合同范本
- TD/T 1044-2014 生產(chǎn)項(xiàng)目土地復(fù)墾驗(yàn)收規(guī)程(正式版)
- 天恒化工有限公司3萬(wàn)噸年水合肼及配套項(xiàng)目環(huán)評(píng)可研資料環(huán)境影響
- 空調(diào)系統(tǒng)改造總結(jié)匯報(bào)
- 大客戶戰(zhàn)略:大客戶全生命周期管理
- 2022年百色市右江區(qū)輔警考試試卷真題
- 學(xué)生自主擇業(yè)申請(qǐng)書(shū)
- 2022版中小學(xué)詩(shī)詞大會(huì)詩(shī)詞知識(shí)競(jìng)賽題庫(kù)(含答案)
- 中藥煎煮與服用方法
- GB/T 9124.1-2019鋼制管法蘭第1部分:PN系列
- GB/T 8685-2008紡織品維護(hù)標(biāo)簽規(guī)范符號(hào)法
- GB/T 6433-2006飼料中粗脂肪的測(cè)定
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論