ResearchReport

LINDSAYDAUGHERTY,JENNAW.KRAMER,LOUIST.MARIANO,CLARECADY,

HEATHERGOMEZ-BENDA?A,TIFFANYBERGLUND,SAMANTHARYAN,MICHELLEBONGARD,JOSHUAEAGAN,CHRISTOPHERJOSEPHDOSS

ConnectingStudentsto

BasicNeedsSupport

AnEvaluationofSingleStopAcrossTenColleges

Formoreinformationonthispublication,visit

/t/RRA3771-1

.

AboutRAND

RANDisaresearchorganizationthatdevelopssolutionstopublicpolicychallengestohelpmakecommunitiesthroughouttheworldsaferandmoresecure,healthierandmoreprosperous.RANDisnonprofit,nonpartisan,andcommittedtothepublicinterest.TolearnmoreaboutRAND,visit

.

ResearchIntegrity

Ourmissiontohelpimprovepolicyanddecisionmakingthroughresearchandanalysisisenabledthroughourcorevaluesofqualityandobjectivityandourunwaveringcommitmenttothehighestlevelofintegrityandethicalbehavior.Tohelpensureourresearchandanalysisarerigorous,objective,andnonpartisan,wesubjectourresearchpublicationstoarobustandexactingquality-assuranceprocess;avoidboththeappearanceandrealityoffinancialandotherconflictsofinterestthroughstafftraining,projectscreening,andapolicyofmandatorydisclosure;andpursuetransparencyinourresearchengagementsthroughourcommitmenttotheopenpublicationofourresearchfindingsandrecommendations,disclosureofthesourceoffundingofpublishedresearch,andpoliciestoensureintellectualindependence.Formoreinformation,visit

/about/research-integrity

.

RAND’spublicationsdonotnecessarilyreflecttheopinionsofitsresearchclientsandsponsors.

PublishedbytheRANDCorporation,SantaMonica,Calif.

?2025RANDCorporation

RANDisaregisteredtrademark.

Coverphotocredit:Shironosov/GettyImages

LimitedPrintandElectronicDistributionRights

Thispublicationandtrademark(s)containedhereinareprotectedbylaw.ThisrepresentationofRANDintellectualpropertyisprovidedfornoncommercialuseonly.Unauthorizedpostingofthispublicationonlineisprohibited;linkingdirectlytoitswebpageon

isencouraged.PermissionisrequiredfromRANDtoreproduce,orreuseinanotherform,anyofitsresearchproductsforcommercialpurposes.Forinformationonreprintandreusepermissions,pleasevisit

/about/publishing/permissions

.

iii

AboutThisReport

Manycollegestudentsarelow-incomeandfacechallengesmeetingtheirbasicneeds,suchasfood,hous-ing,andtransportation.Postsecondaryinstitutionsareincreasinglyofferingbasicneedssupports,includingfoodpantries,emergencyaid,andsupportwithpublicbenefits.Thehopeisthattheseresourcesincreasethelikelihoodthatlow-incomestudentswillsucceedincollege.SingleStopisaU.S.nonprofitorganizationthatoffersU.S.collegesservicesandtoolstohelpstudentsachieveeconomicsecurity.Itsportfolioofoptionsincludesanonlineplatformthatscreensstudents’eligibilityforpublicbenefitsprograms,asearchtoolthatconnectsstudentstocommunityandcollegeresources,andcasemanagementfacilitatedbycollegestaff.SingleStoprecommendsthatcollegesembedothersupports,suchastaxservices,toenhancetheresourcesprovided.Italsorecommendscollegesofferlow-stigmaopportunitiestointroducestudentstoSingleStop.Inthisreport,wediscussanevaluationofSingleStopacrosstencollegesinColoradoandNorthCarolina.WeexaminedSingleStop’simplementation,studenttake-upacrossinstitutionsandsubgroupsofinterest,andoutcomesforstudentswhousedservices.Despiteourrigorousexperimentaldesign,weviewthestudytake-upasinsufficienttoassesstheefficacyofSingleStopsupports.Weunpackthereasonsforlowtake-upandprovidesomelessonslearnedforcollegesimplementingbasicneedssupports.

AnonlineTechnicalAnnextothisreportpresentsadditionaldatagatheredduringthestudyperiod.Theannexisavailableat

/t/RRA3771-1

.

RANDEducationandLabor

ThisworkwasconductedwithinRANDEducationandLabor,adivisionofRANDthatconductsresearchonearlychildhoodthroughpostsecondaryeducationprograms,workforcedevelopment,andprogramsandpoliciesaffectingworkers,entrepreneurship,andfinancialliteracyanddecisionmaking.Formoreinforma-tion,visit

/education-and-labor

oremail

educationandlabor@

.

Funding

ThisresearchwassponsoredbytheInstituteofEducationSciences(U.S.DepartmentofEducation)throughgrantR305H200101totheRANDCorporation.TheopinionsexpressedarethoseoftheauthorsanddonotrepresenttheviewsoftheInstituteofEducationSciencesortheU.S.DepartmentofEducation.

Acknowledgments

Wehavemanypartnerswhowereinstrumentalinhelpingtosupportthisstudy.WethankMichaelVentefromtheColoradoDepartmentofHigherEducationforthoughtpartnership,andwearegratefultoLandonPirius,SeanFlohr,andLi-LingHsuattheColoradoCommunityCollegeSystem,whohelpedprovidedataandsupportdissemination.InNorthCarolina,JenniferMcLean,AndreaCrowley,andPatrickCranefromtheNorthCarolinaCommunityCollegeSystemprovidedessentialsupporttothestudywithdata,thoughtpartnership,anddissemination.TheprojectwasbuiltinclosepartnershipwithSingleStop,andwethankClareCady,SarahCrawford,JoanneAnthony,MartinHanna,andStevenWilliamsfortheirsupportwith

ConnectingStudentstoBasicNeedsSupport

iv

recruitment,data,andfeedbackonfindings.Wearegratefultoouradvisorygroupfortheirinsightsandadvice,includingPacoMartorell,DenaShonts,WillSimpkins,andMichaelWeiss.CourtneyKasewasessen–tialtosupportingthestudentsurveyeffortsfortheproject.Ourpeerreviewers,SaraGoldrick–Rab,MichelleHodara,ChristineMulhern,BenMaster,andHeatherSchwartzprovidedvaluablefeedbackthatwasessen–tialtoimprovingthereport.WethankLibbySweeneyforeditingthereportandMonetteVelascoforcoor–dinatingthereport’sproduction.WealsothankJamesBensonforhisinputthroughout,andweappreciateThomasBrockandotherswhoprovidedvaluableinsightsontheworkatconferences.Thisprojectwascode–velopedwithFatihUnlu,andwethankhimforhiscontributionstothedesignandresearch.

v

Summary

Manycollegestudentsarelow-incomeandfacechallengesmeetingtheirbasicneeds,suchasfood,hous-ing,andtransportation.Postsecondaryinstitutionsareincreasinglyofferingbasicneedssupports,includingfoodpantries,emergencyaid,andsupportwithpublicbenefits.Thehopeisthattheseresourcescanhelpensurethatlow-incomestudentshavetheopportunitytosucceedincollege.SingleStopisaU.S.nonprofitorganizationthatoffersU.S.collegesservicesandtoolstohelpstudentsachieveeconomicsecurity.Itsport-folioofoptionsincludesanonlineplatformthatscreensstudents’eligibilityforpublicbenefitsprograms,asearchtoolthatconnectsstudentstocommunityandcollegeresources,andcasemanagementfacilitatedbycollegestaff.SingleStoprecommendsthatcollegesembedothersupports,suchastaxservices,toenhancetheresourcesprovided.Italsorecommendscollegesofferlow-stigmaopportunitiestointroducestudentstoSingleStop.Inthisreport,wediscussanevaluationofSingleStopacrosstencollegesinColoradoandNorthCarolina.WeexaminedSingleStop’simplementationacrosstheteninstitutions,studenttake-upacrossinsti-tutionsandsubgroupsofinterest,andoutcomesforstudentswhousedservices.Despiteourrigorousexperi-mentaldesign,weviewthestudytake-upasinsufficienttoassesstheefficacyofSingleStopsupports.Weunpackthereasonsforlowtake-upandprovidesomelessonslearnedforcollegesimplementingbasicneedssupports.

Approach

WeconductedanevaluationofSingleStopintenpostsecondaryinstitutions(ninecommunitycollegesandoneuniversity)fromColoradoandNorthCarolinabetween2020and2024.Thestudywasdesignedtobeanexperimentalassessmentoftheprogram’sefficacy.Inthespringandfall2021semesters,8,628studentswhorespondedtoabaselinesurveyandindicatedsometypeoffinancialorbasicneedwererandomizedtoeitherreceiveaccesstotheSingleStoptoolandfollow-upfromcasemanagers(thetreatmentgroup)orreceivethecollege’susualsupports(thecontrolgroup).Wethenfollowedstudentsthroughsurveydata,SingleStopsystemdata,andcollegeadministrativedatatoassesstake-upandoutcomes.Weseelowtake-upasevidence

thatSingleStopdidnotreachstudentsasintendedanddidnotdeliverameaningfulintervention,andwedonotseeouroutcomefindingsasevidenceoftheeffectsofasuccessfulimplementationoftheSingleStopprogram.

Whilelowtake-uplimitedourabilitytoassessefficacy,ourrichqualitativeandsurveydatafromstu-dentsandstaffacrossthetencollegesandouranalysisofimplementationcanprovideusefulinsightsforthefieldonthedeliveryofbasicneedsservices.Wecollectedbaselineandone-yearfollow-upsurveysfromthousandsofstudents;interviewedstudents,casemanagers,andleadership;conductedsurveysofsitestaff;andreviewedprogrammaterialsandevidenceoffidelity(e.g.,aspreadsheettrackingoutreach).Welever-agedthesedatatodescribetheimplementationofSingleStopacrossthetencollegesandunpacksomeofthecontributorstolowtake-up.

KeyFindings

Weidentifiedsixkeyfindingsfromourexperimentalstudyonimplementationandourbroaderanalysisofsurveyresultsfromstudentsacrossourtenstudycolleges:

ConnectingStudentstoBasicNeedsSupport

vi

?Thestudycollegesimplementedtheprogramwithvaryinglevelsoffidelity,andmanystruggledtosuccessfullyimplementcorefeaturesoftheprogram.Mostcollegeswestudiedreportedchallengesinengagingstudentsinthepublicbenefitsapplicationsprocess;severalchosetonotoffertaxservices,andsomesitesfacedcompetingleadershippriorities.

?RelativelyfewstudentsusedSingleStopandwereconnectedtoresources.Only12.7percentofstu-dentscompletedascreenerforpublicbenefiteligibility,and0.9percentengagedwithcasemanagers.Adultlearners,parents,andlow-incomestudentsweremorelikelytointeractwithSingleStopservices.Givenlittleornotake-upoftheSingleStopprogram’scasemanagementsupports,wesawnochangesinstudentoutcomes.

?Studentswhoreportedfoodand/orhousinginsecurity,hadlowhouseholdincomes,receivedPellGrants,and/orpreviouslyusedsimilarcollegesupportservicesweremostlikelytousecollegepublicbenefitsupportandcommunityservicereferrals.Onceweaccountedforthesefactors,therewerenodifferencesinuseofthesesupportservicesbydemographiccharacteristicsorstudentsenseofbelonging.

?Thecoronavirusdisease2019(COVID-19)pandemicshiftedthecontextinwaysthatmayhavelim-itedSingleStoptake-up.Between2020and2023,collegesreceivedaninfusionoffederalfunding,andalargeportionofthisfundingwentdirectlytostudentsasemergencyaidandstudenttuitionbalancepayments.Leadershipandstaffhadcompetingpriorities.Virtualcommunicationandvirtualservicedeliverybecamethestandard.

?Issueswiththedesignanddeliveryoftheprogramatstudycollegesmayhavecontributedtolowtake-up.Collegeswerelimitedintheoutreachoptionstheycouldusefortheexperimentalstudy.Theprimaryoutreachstrategiesofdistributionthroughavoluntaryout-of-classactivityandperiodicemailoutreachfromcasemanagerswerenotsuccessfulinengagingstudents.

?ManystudentsinthetenstudycollegescouldhavepotentiallybenefitedfromSingleStop’sservices.

Nearlytwo-thirdsofthestudentswhorespondedtosurveysacrossthestudycollegesreportedsomeformofbasicneedsinsecurity,andasubstantialportionofthepopulationwereparticipatinginpublicbenefitsprogramsbutstillfacedunmetneeds.FewstudentsreportedhavingreceivedpublicbenefitapplicationassistanceandreferralstocommunitysupportsbeforecollegesofferedSingleStop.

LessonsLearned

Weidentifiedseveralkeylessonsfromtheworkthatshedlightonhowcollegesmightsupportsuccessfulimplementationandtake-upofbasicneedsprogramsandhowresearcherscanbuildeffectivestudiesonbasicneedsinterventions.

Lesson1:Implementingnewbasicneedssupportprogramswithfidelitycanbeachallenge,particu-larlyduringsuchcrisesastheCOVID-19pandemic,whichconsumedleadershipandstaffcapacity.Clearguidancetoinstitutionsontheresourcesneededtosuccessfullystandupprograms,informationonprom-isingapproachestoimplementation,andstatefundingtosupporttheseprogramsarefactorsthatcanhelptosupportbetterimplementation.Collegesaimingtosuccessfullylaunchprogramsshouldensurethatkeyfacilitatorsareinplace,suchasleadershipsupport,funding,staffcapacity,andstronginternalandexter-nalnetworks.Researchersmaywanttobeconsiderthetrade-offsinstudyingnewprogramsandconsiderapproachesthatenablethemtoevaluateefficacyfurtherintoimplementation,asfidelitymaybelowerintheearlieryearsofimplementationandfindingsarenotlikelytoberelevanttoprogramsfurtherfromlaunch. Lesson2:Buildingupawarenessofandtrustinbasicneedssupportsrequiressustainedoutreachthroughawidevarietyofapproaches.Collegesshouldbeleveragingproactive,systematicapproachestooutreach(e.g.,embeddedopportunitiesforscreenings,referralsfromotherstaff),aswellasmore-traditional

Summary

vii

outreachapproaches(e.g.,tabling,emails,website),topromotesupportservices.Itmaytakesometimeforprogramsandcasemanagerstobuildtheawarenessandtrustneededforconsistenttake-upofservices,astherearesubstantialbarriersduetostigmaarounduseofbasicneedsservices.Experimentalstudiesoftenlimitbroadoutreacharoundinterventionsandsuppressawarenessandtake-up,andresearchersshouldcare-fullyconsiderhowtominimizebarrierstooutreachandensurethatinterventionsaresalienttotreatmentstudents.

Lesson3:Althoughproactiveoutreachinformingabroadpopulationofstudentsaboutbasicneedssupportmaybevaluable,collegesmaywanttofocusprogramswithtime-intensivesupports—suchaspublicbenefitapplicationsupportandcasemanagement—onasmallersubsetofstudents.Identifyingwhichstudentsrequirebasicneedssupportsandarewillingtousethesupportscanbechallenging.Collegestafffacebarriersinaccesstodatathatallowthemtoidentifywhichstudentsmostneedsupport,andtheyoftenturntosimpleintakeformsandconversationswithstudents,whichmaybethebestwaytotargetser-vices.Wehadaccesstouniquelydetailedbaselinedatathatallowedustoidentifystudentsbasedonlevelofneed,andnarrowercriteriaforoursamplemayhavehelpedincreaseratesoftake-upbyensuringthattheeffortsfocusedonstudentswhoweremostlikelytoneedandbenefitfromthesupports.Researchstudiesshouldcarefullyconsidertheoverallpopulationandwhichstudentsmightbenefitmostfrommore-intensivebasicneedssupport.Experimentalstudiesthatrequiresufficienttake-uptoensureefficacymaybenefitfromfocusingonthosemostlikelytousesupports.

Lesson4:Postsecondaryinstitutionsmaywanttofocusonofferingbasicneedsservicesthatarequickandaccessibleforstudentsandstafftouseanddirectlyconnectstudentstoresources.Studentswhoarestrugglingwithbasicneedsarelikelytobeworkingandjugglingavarietyofresponsibilitiesandmaybeenrolledincollegeforonlyasemesterortwo.Helpingindividualswithpublicbenefitsapplicationscanbealongprocessthatrequiresaninterviewandverificationofdocuments,anditmaybemonthsbeforeastudentreceivessupport.More-directfinancialandfoodsupports(e.g.,emergencyaid,freeandreduced-pricelunch)maybeeasiertodeliverandmoreeffectiveformeetingurgentneeds.Butmanycollegescontinuetoviewpublicapplicationsupportandcommunityresourcereferralsasavaluablecomponentoftheirbroadervari-etyofservices.MostcollegestaffandstudentsviewedSingleStop’sportalasaccessible,butsomecaseman-agersreportedthatthe20-minutescreenermaynotbefeasibleforbusystudents.ExperiencedcasemanagersmighthavequickerwaystoassesslikelySupplementalNutritionAssistanceProgramandMedicaideligibilityandcouldthenimmediatelyjumpdirectlyintohelpingstudentsfilloutapplications.Andalthoughcollegeswereinterestedinprovidingcasemanagementtostudents,manyalreadyhadtechnologytosupportcasemanagement,andwerefrustratedthattheirexistingsystemscouldnotintegratewithSingleStop.Assessingtheaccessibilityofinterventionstostudentsandstaffshouldbeanimportantpartofidentifyingbarrierstotake-upandimplementation.

viii

Contents

AboutThisReport iii

Summary v

FiguresandTables x

CHAPTER1

Introduction 1

CHAPTER2

Background 3

EvidenceonBasicNeedsSupportforCollegeStudents 3

SingleStopasaBasicNeedsProgram 4

CollegesParticipatingintheStudy 6

StudyTimingandtheCOVID-19Pandemic 7

CHAPTER3

StudyApproach 8

ResearchDesignandSamples 8

DataandMeasures 11

CHAPTER4

ImplementationofSingleStopAcrossStudyColleges 13

CoreComponentsofSingleStopfortheStudy 13

FidelityofImplementation 14

FactorsThatHelpedandHinderedImplementation 15

Summary 18

CHAPTER5

StudentTake-UpandOutcomes 20

Take-UpofSingleStopServices 20

OutcomesforSingleStopUsersandNon-Users 22

Summary 23

CHAPTER6

FactorsThatMightHaveShapedTake-UpofSingleStop 24

IdentifyingStudentsforBasicNeedsServices 24

DesignandDeliveryoftheProgram 32

ChangesintheContextDuetoCOVID-19 33

Summary 34

CHAPTER7

Discussion 35

Contents

ix

Abbreviations 40

References 41

Availableat

/t/RRA3771–1

ANNEX

ConnectingStudentstoBasicNeedsSupport:AnEvaluationofSingleStopAcrossTen

Colleges—TechnicalAnnex

x

FiguresandTables

Figures

2.1.SettingsofParticipatingColleges 6

3.1.TheStudyRecruitmentandRandomizationProcess 9

4.1.FidelityofImplementationScoresbyCollegeandSemester 16

5.1.RatesofSingleStopTake-UpbyStudyCollege 21

5.2.SingleStopTake-UpRatesAmongSubgroups 22

6.1.TypesofBasicNeedsInsecurityStudentsIndicated 25

6.2.RatesofBasicNeedsInsecurityAcrossStudyColleges 26

6.3.Self-ReportedPublicBenefitProgramParticipationRatesbyState 28

6.4.Self-ReportedSNAPParticipationRatesbyCollegeandFoodInsecurity 28

6.5.Self-ReportedUseofCollegeBasicNeedsSupportServicesatBaseline 29

Tables

3.1.CharacteristicsoftheStudySample 10

3.2.DataSourcesandKeyMeasuresfortheStudy 11

4.1.DifferencesBetweentheTraditionalSingleStopModelandtheStudyModel 13

4.2.CoreComponentsandFidelityMeasuresforSingleStopImplementation 15

4.3.FacilitatorsandBarrierstoImplementation 17

5.1.OutcomesbyTreatmentStatus 23

6.1.CharacteristicsofStudentsWhoAreandAreNotFacingBasicNeedsInsecurity 27

6.2.BaselineFactorsAssociatedwithUseofSingleStop–LikeSupportServices 31

CHAPTER1

1

Introduction

ManyU.S.collegestudentsareunabletomeettheirbasicneedsandstruggletosecureregularfoodandhous-ing.A2023nationalsurveyfoundthatnearlyone-quarterofcollegestudentsarefoodinsecure,and8per-centareexperiencinghomelessness(Goldrick-Rab,2023).Basicneedsinsecurityhasnegativeimplicationsforthephysicalandmentalhealthofcollegestudents(Broton,Mohebali,andLingo,2022;Brueningetal.,2018;Eisenbergetal.,2016;ElZeinetal.,2017;Knoletal.,2017;Martinezetal.,2020).Foodandhousinginsecuritycanalsoposeathreattosuchacademicoutcomesasgrades(Maroto,Snelling,andLinck,2015;Martinezetal.,2020),persistence,andcompletion(Broton,2017;Leungetal.,2021).Individualswithcollegecredentialsearnmorewagesthanthosewhodonothavecollegecredentials(e.g.,BelfieldandBailey,2017;Carnevale,Rose,andCheah,2013;OreopoulosandPetronijevic,2013),anddropoutratesfromcollegearehigherforlow-incomestudents(e.g.,EngleandTinto,2008;HardyandMarcotte,2020).Withoutsufficientfinancialandwraparoundsupportstoensurethatlow-incomecollegestudentscanmeettheirbasicneeds,thesestudentsmaybelikelytoendupinapersistentstateofpoverty.

CollegesacrosstheUnitedStateshaverecognizedtheimportanceofhelpingtomeetthebasicneedsoftheirstudentsandareincreasinglyprovidingsupporttostudentsintheformofemergencyaid,foodpan-tries,andassistancewithpublicbenefits(e.g.,Hickey,Brown,andFiagbor,2023;KentuckyCouncilonPost-secondaryEducation,2023;Nixetal.,2021;TennesseeHigherEducationCommission,2023).SuchstatesasCaliforniaandOregonhavepassedlegislationtoestablishbasicneedssupportcentersandfundstaffwhocanhelpcollegestudentsnavigatepublicbenefitprogramsandotherresourcesthatmaybeavailableinthecom-munity(Bouabibsa,2022;Powell,2021).Duringthecoronavirusdisease2019(COVID-19)pandemic,largefederalinvestmentsthatweredirectedtocollegesandstudentsthroughtheHigherEducationEmergencyReliefFundingprogramhelpedcollegestobuildinternalstaffcapacityandexpandedtheemergencyaidandtuitionsupportthatcollegescouldofferstudents(Klempinetal.,2024;Sarica,Monahan,andAnderson,2023).

SingleStopisaU.S.nonprofitorganizationthatoffersU.S.collegesaprogramtohelpstudentsachieveeconomicsecurity.Morethan70postsecondaryinstitutionsacrossthecountryhaveusedtheSingleStopprogramsinceitwasfirstdevelopedin2009.CollegesofferingtheprogrampayforaSingleStoplicense,whichprovidesaccesstoanonlineplatformthatoffersstudentsdirectsupportwithbasicneedsandcasemanagementcapabilitiesforcollegestaff.SingleStop’snationalofficeprovidesthecollegestaffwithSingleStopplatformtraining,technicalassistance,andintegrationwithothersupports(e.g.,emergencyaid,hous-ingsupport),aswellasadditionaloutreachapproaches,tocreateaone-stopshopforstudentswhoseeksup-ports.SingleStop’sonlineplatformoffersascreenerthatassesseseligibilityfortheSupplementalNutritionAssistanceProgram(SNAP),sometimesreferredtoasfoodstamps,andMedicaidthroughaseriesofques-tionsandinformationonstateandfederalrequirements.CollegestaffhelppopulateasearchtoolwithintheSingleStopplatformwithcommunityresourcesandexternalpartnerstowhomstudentscanreachoutforvarioustypesofsupport(e.g.,foodpantries,legalservices).CollegestaffthenleveragecasemanagementcapabilitieswithintheSingleStopplatformtofollowupwithstudents,ensurethattheyareconnectedtoresources,andtracktheresourcestheyreceive.

ConnectingStudentstoBasicNeedsSupport

2

TwostudiesfoundthatwhensomecollegesrolledoutSingleStopandmadeitaccessibletotheirentirecampus,studentswhointeractedwithSingleStopweremoreacademicallysuccessfulthansimilarstudentswhodidnotinteractwithSingleStop(Daugherty,Johnston,andBerglund,2020;Zhu,Harnett,andScuello,2018).However,adifferentstudydidnotfindevidenceofmorepositiveoutcomesforSingleStopusers(DaughertyandBerglund,2018).Inthesestudies,itishardtoaccountforunobservabledifferencesbetweenthestudentswhoseekouttheSingleStopofficeandengagewiththecasemanagersandtoolandthosewhodonot.Manystudentsdonothavethetime,information,andmotivationtoseekoutSingleStop,andthese“unobserved”characteristics(i.e.,characteristicsthatwecannotmeasure)arelikelytoberelatedtoacademicoutcomes.Inaddition,differencesintake-upandoutcomesvariedwidelyacrosscolleges,suggestingthatthecontextandhowthetoolisimplementedmayplayaroleinwhethercollegesseebetteroutcomesforstudentswhointeractwithSingleStop.

Tobuildmore-rigorousevidenceontheSingleStopprogramandassessitsefficacyandimplementationacrossdifferentcontexts,wedesignedarandomizedcontrolledtrial.Inthespringandfallsemestersof2021,werecruitedstudentsfromtencollegesacrossColoradoandNorthCarolinaintothestudy,collectedrichbaselinesurveydatafromstudents,andrandomizedhalfofthestudentsintoatreatmentgroup.StudentsinthetreatmentgroupreceivedimmediateaccesstotheSingleStoptool,personalizedoutreachfromacasemanagerthroughemailsandsometimestextmessages,andmonthlyemailsfromacasemanagertoencour-agetheuseofSingleStopandthecasemanagementsupport.Weexaminedtake-upoftheprogramandout-comesthroughSingleStopsystemdata,administrativedata,andafollow-upsurveyofstudents.

Wefoundthattake-upoftheprogramwaslow—only12.7percentofstudentsassignedtotheSingleStopgroupoptingtocompletethescreenerandonly0.9percentfollowingupwithcasemanagerstoreceiveadditionalsupport.Whilescreeningrateswerecomparablewiththoseofothercollegesthatarenewlyimple-mentingSingleStop,studentsatothercollegestypicallyengagemoredeeplywiththecasemanagementsup-ports.TheongoingsupportandconnectiontoresourcesthatcasemanagersofferareessentialtoSingleStop’smodel;beingscreenedforpublicbenefitseligibility(i.e.,aninformationalstrategy)aloneisunlikelytobesufficienttoconnectstudentstotheresourcestheyneedandsupporttheiracademicsuccess.Weseelowtake-upasevidencethatSingleStopdidnotreachstudentsasintendedanddidnotdeliverameaningfulintervention,andwedonotseeouroutcomefindingsasevidenceoftheeffectsofasuccessfulimplementa-tionoftheSingleStopprogram.

Inthisreport,weunpackseveralfactorsthatmayhavecontributedtolowtake-up.Wemayhavedeliveredservicestoobroadlyandcouldhavefocusedmorenarrowlyonthesetofstudentswhoaremostlikelytoneedsupports.Thecollegeswere