專家型教師與新入職教師英語(yǔ)課堂言語(yǔ)互動(dòng)特征比較研究_第1頁(yè)
專家型教師與新入職教師英語(yǔ)課堂言語(yǔ)互動(dòng)特征比較研究_第2頁(yè)
專家型教師與新入職教師英語(yǔ)課堂言語(yǔ)互動(dòng)特征比較研究_第3頁(yè)
全文預(yù)覽已結(jié)束

付費(fèi)下載

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

專家型教師與新入職教師英語(yǔ)課堂言語(yǔ)互動(dòng)特征比較研究Title:AComparativeStudyofVerbalInteractionsinEnglishClassroomsbetweenExpertTeachersandNoviceTeachersAbstract:ThispaperaimstoinvestigateandcomparetheverbalinteractionsbetweenexpertteachersandnoviceteachersinEnglishclassrooms.Theresearchisconductedwiththepurposeofexploringthedistinctivefeaturesofverbalinteractionsintermsofteacher-studentexchanges,discoursepatterns,andlanguageproficiency.Aseriesofclassroomobservations,interviews,andquestionnaireswereusedtocollectdata.Thefindingsrevealthatexpertteacherspromotehigherlevelsofstudentengagementthrougheffectivequestioningandfeedbacktechniques,whilenoviceteacherstendtoadoptmoreteacher-centeredanddirectiveapproaches.Implicationsforteachertrainingandprofessionaldevelopmentarediscussed.1.IntroductionInrecentyears,aconsiderableamountofattentionhasbeengiventounderstandingtheinfluentialfactorsinEnglishlanguageclassrooms.Oneaspectofthesefactorsisthelevelofexpertiseandexperienceoftheteacher.ThisstudyaimstoinvestigatetheverbalinteractionsbetweenexpertteachersandnoviceteachersinEnglishclassrooms.Bycomparingtheirteachingpracticesandlinguisticbehaviors,thisresearchprovidesinsightintothepotentialimpactofteacherexperienceonclassroomdynamicsandstudentengagement.2.MethodologyToconductthisstudy,amixed-methodsapproachwasadopted.Classroomobservation,teacherinterviews,andstudentquestionnaireswereemployedtogatherbothqualitativeandquantitativedata.Atotalof10Englishlessons,taughtby5expertteachersand5noviceteachersrespectively,wereobservedandrecorded.Semi-structuredinterviewswereconductedwiththeteachersaftertheobservations.Additionally,questionnaireswereadministeredtothestudentstocollecttheirfeedbackonteacher-studentinteractions.3.FindingsandAnalysis3.1Teacher-StudentExchangesTheanalysisofteacher-studentexchangesrevealedthatexpertteacherstendtoengagestudentsinmorefrequentandmeaningfulinteractionscomparedtonoviceteachers.Theyutilizeopen-endedquestions,encouragepeer-to-peerdiscussions,andprovideopportunitiesforstudentstoexpresstheiropinions.Incontrast,noviceteachersoftenrelyonclosed-endedquestionsandexhibitaone-wayflowofinformation.Asaresult,studentparticipationandcriticalthinkingarelimited.3.2DiscoursePatternsExpertteachersdemonstratemorevarieddiscoursepatterns,includingprovidingclearinstructions,explainingconcepts,andusingauthenticexamples.Theyusediverseteachingstrategiestofacilitatestudentunderstandingandpromoteactivelearning.Conversely,noviceteacherstendtoadoptamorelecture-styleapproach,deliveringinformationwithoutmuchconsiderationforstudents'comprehension.Thislecture-styleteachingdiscouragesstudentengagementandinteraction.3.3LanguageProficiencyExpertteachersexhibitahigherleveloflanguageproficiency,whichpositivelyimpactstheirverbalinteractionswithstudents.Theydemonstratearichandauthenticuseofvocabulary,grammar,andidiomaticexpressions.Ontheotherhand,noviceteachersmaystrugglewithlanguageaccuracyandfluency,leadingtolesseffectivecommunicationandreducedstudentcomprehension.4.ImplicationsTheidentifieddifferencesinverbalinteractionsbetweenexpertteachersandnoviceteachershavevariousimplicationsforteachertrainingandprofessionaldevelopment.Noviceteacherscanbenefitfrommentorshipprogramsandongoingsupporttoenhancetheirinstructionalskillsandcreateamorestudent-centeredlearningenvironment.Languageproficiencyimprovementprogramsshouldbeprovidedtonoviceteacherstoincreasetheireffectivenessintheclassroom.Additionally,teachertrainingprogramsshouldfocusonpromotingeffectivequestioningandfeedbackstrategiestoengagestudentsactivelyinthelearningprocess.5.ConclusionThisstudyprovidesacomparativeanalysisofverbalinteractionsbetweenexpertteachersandnoviceteachersinEnglishclassrooms.Thefindingsdemonstratethatexpertteachersemploymorestudent-centeredapproaches,promotestudentengagement,utilizediverseteachingstrategies,anddemonstrateahigherleveloflanguageproficiency.Incontrast,noviceteachersoftenrelyo

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論